From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Clear the root_domain cpumasks in init_rootdomain()
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:28:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203082800.GA2321@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565FAC78.3030205@redhat.com>
* Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 12/03/2015 at 12:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:12:30PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> On 12/02/2015 at 08:34 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:52:59PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> >>>> The patch cleans the garbage by using zalloc_cpumask_var()
> >>>> instead of alloc_cpumask_var() for root_domain::rto_mask
> >>>> allocation, thereby addressing the issues.
> >>> How did you notice this? Also do we want to do the same for the kmalloc
> >> When doing review.
> > Nice, will you be looking for similar issues elsewhere in the scheduler
> > too?
>
> Sure :-)
Hm, is the alloc_cpumask_var() done in alloc_sched_domains() safe?
At least the usage pattern in init_sched_domains() looks unsafe:
doms_cur = alloc_sched_domains(ndoms_cur);
if (!doms_cur)
doms_cur = &fallback_doms;
cpumask_andnot(doms_cur[0], cpu_map, cpu_isolated_map);
I think alloc_cpumask_var() is a fundamentally unsafe or at least fragile
operation, because the uninitialized variable bug will only happen on large CPU
count kernels AFAICS - so it's inviting such bugs.
How about we rename alloc_cpumask_var() to alloc_cpumask_var_noinit() or at least
__alloc_cpumask_var(), to make this property easier to see?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-02 11:52 [PATCH] sched/core: Clear the root_domain cpumasks in init_rootdomain() Xunlei Pang
2015-12-02 12:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02 13:12 ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-02 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-03 2:44 ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-03 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-12-03 11:52 ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-04 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-04 8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-04 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-04 8:28 ` Xunlei Pang
2015-12-04 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-03 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-04 11:52 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Xunlei Pang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151203082800.GA2321@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.