From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add __GFP_ZERO to alloc_cpumask_var_node() if ptr is zero
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 09:23:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151207082342.GA13606@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bna3rph4.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
* Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> writes:
> > * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >> I don't think there are great answers here. But adding more subtle zeroing
> >> semantics feels wrong, even if it will mostly Just Work.
> >
> > It's not subtle if the naming clearly reflects it (hence my suggestion to rename
> > the API) - and the status quo for on-stack allocations is zeroing anyway, so it's
> > not a big jump...
>
> True, but we already have zalloc_cpumask_var() though if we want that?
Indeed, didn't realize that.
> It probably makes sense to just switch everyone to that and get rid of the non-z
> one?
Yeah, I think this long-lived bug is a proper trigger for that. Lemme send a
2-patch series.
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-07 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-03 22:24 [RFC][PATCH] Add __GFP_ZERO to alloc_cpumask_var_node() if ptr is zero Steven Rostedt
2015-12-04 1:35 ` Rusty Russell
2015-12-04 2:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-04 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-04 20:30 ` Rusty Russell
2015-12-06 17:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-07 1:56 ` Rusty Russell
2015-12-07 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151207082342.GA13606@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.