All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, hayeswang@realtek.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (4.3.0) r8152: deadlock related to runtime suspend?
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:37:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151207093755.GA4283@al> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56654D56.3080402@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:11:50PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Have you ever tried disabling auto-pm? Did things go smoothly if auto-pm is disabled?
> 
> I always disable usb auto-pm in below way.
> 
> # echo on | tee /sys/bus/usb/devices/*/power/control
> # echo on > /sys/bus/pci/devices/<bus_name>/power/control
> 
> Thanks,
> Baolu

Hi Baolu,

The deadlock does not seem to occur with auto-PM disabled, but that is a
workaround for the issue. The hang can always be reproduced under this
test:

 - Start a QEMU VM, passing through the USB adapter
 - This VM boots to a busybox shell with no other services running or
   udev magic (to reduce interference).
 - Enable runtime PM for all devices by default (see script below)
 - From the console, invoke "ip link set eth1 up" (eth0 is a virtio
   adapter).

    # somewhere in /init after mounting filesystems
    echo /sbin/hotplug > /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug
    echo auto | tee  /sys/bus/pci/devices/*/power/control \
        /sys/bus/usb/devices/*/power/control >/dev/null

    #!/bin/sh
    # /sbin/hotplug
    path="/sys/$DEVPATH/power/control"
    [ -e "$path" ] || return
    newval=auto
    read status < "$path"
    if [ "x$status" != "x$newval" ]; then
        echo "$DEVPATH: $status -> $newval" >/dev/kmsg
        echo $newval > "$path"
    fi

With "auto", the ip command hangs (a trace can be found on the bottom of
this mail). With "on", it does not.

If I keep a loop spinning that invokes `ethtool eth1`, the command
returns immediately without issues (presumably because the device is not
suspended through runtime PM).

Under some circumstances I get a lockdep warning (when trying to bring
an interface down if I remember correctly). Its trace can be found on
the bottom of this mail.

I'll keep testing. For the lockdep warning, my initial guess is that
calling schedule_delayed_work_sync under tp->lock is a bad idea because
scheduled work can execute and try to claim tp->lock too.

Maybe there are two different lockup cases here, I'll keep testing.

Kind regards,
Peter

> On 12/05/2015 06:59 PM, Peter Wu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I rarely use a Realtek USB 3.0 Gigabit Ethernet adapter (vid/pid
> > 0bda:8153), but when I did last night, it resulted in a lockup of
> > processes doing networking ("ip link", "ping", "ethtool", ...).
> >
> > A (few) minute(s) before that event, I noticed that there was no network
> > connectivity (ping hung) which was somehow solved by invoking "ethtool
> > eth1" (triggering runtime pm wakeup?). This same trick did not work at
> > the next event. Invoking "ethtool eth1", "ip link", etc. hung completely
> > and interrupt (^C) did not work at all.
> >
> > Since that did not work, I pulled the USB adapter and re-inserted it,
> > hoping it would reset things. That did not work at all, there was a
> > "usb disconnect" message, but no further driver messages.
> >
> > Fast forward an hour, and it has become a disaster. I have terminated
> > and killed many programs via SysRq but am still unable to get a stable
> > system that does not hang on network I/O. Even the suspend process
> > fails so in the end I attempted to shutdown the system. After half an
> > hour after getting the poweroff message, I issued SysRq + B to reboot
> > (since SysRq + O did not shut down either).
> >
> > Attached are logs with various various backtraces from SysRq and failed
> > suspend. Let me know if you need more information!
> >
> > By the way, often I have to rmmod xhci and re-insert it, otherwise
> > plugging it in does not result in a detection. A USB 2.0 port does not
> > have this problem (runtime PM is enabled for all devices). This is the
> > USB 3.0 port:
> >
> >     02:00.0 USB controller [0c03]: NEC Corporation uPD720200 USB 3.0
> >     Host Controller [1033:0194] (rev 03)
> 

-- 

lockdep splat from the bare machine:

    ======================================================
    [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
    4.3.0-custom #1 Tainted: G           O   
    -------------------------------------------------------
    kworker/0:1/38 is trying to acquire lock:
     (&tp->control){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa05d3544>] rtl8152_resume+0x24/0x130 [r8152]

    but task is already holding lock:
     ((&(&tp->schedule)->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8107819c>] process_one_work+0x15c/0x660

    which lock already depends on the new lock.


    the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

    -> #1 ((&(&tp->schedule)->work)){+.+.+.}:

    [<ffffffff810b17d3>] lock_acquire+0xc3/0x1d0
           [<ffffffff8107751d>] flush_work+0x3d/0x290
           [<ffffffff810791ae>] __cancel_work_timer+0xfe/0x1c0
           [<ffffffff810792a3>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20
           [<ffffffffa05d0dea>] rtl8152_set_speed+0x2a/0x260 [r8152]
           [<ffffffffa05d4a26>] rtl8152_open+0x396/0x4f0 [r8152]
           [<ffffffff81567ebf>] __dev_open+0xaf/0x120
           [<ffffffff815681ad>] __dev_change_flags+0x9d/0x160
           [<ffffffff81568299>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x70
           [<ffffffff8157785a>] do_setlink+0x5ba/0xb00
           [<ffffffff81578469>] rtnl_newlink+0x5a9/0x8a0
           [<ffffffff81576bb4>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x84/0x210
           [<ffffffff81599ab7>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x97/0xb0
           [<ffffffff81576b1a>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40
           [<ffffffff8159943e>] netlink_unicast+0x1be/0x2d0
           [<ffffffff8159983b>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2eb/0x3a0
           [<ffffffff81545428>] sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x50
           [<ffffffff81545d42>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x292/0x2a0
           [<ffffffff81546cc2>] __sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x80
           [<ffffffff81546d12>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20
           [<ffffffff816707d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f

    -> #0 (&tp->control){+.+.+.}:
           [<ffffffff810b0ed7>] __lock_acquire+0x1a47/0x1a50
           [<ffffffff810b17d3>] lock_acquire+0xc3/0x1d0
           [<ffffffff8166c0a7>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0
           [<ffffffffa05d3544>] rtl8152_resume+0x24/0x130 [r8152]
           [<ffffffff814d735f>] usb_resume_interface.isra.6+0x9f/0x100
           [<ffffffff814d75fa>] usb_resume_both+0x6a/0x130
           [<ffffffff814d869a>] usb_runtime_resume+0x1a/0x20
           [<ffffffff814602c2>] __rpm_callback+0x32/0x70
           [<ffffffff8146035f>] rpm_callback+0x5f/0x80
           [<ffffffff81460c4b>] rpm_resume+0x4db/0x7d0
           [<ffffffff81460b0c>] rpm_resume+0x39c/0x7d0
           [<ffffffff8146211e>] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4e/0x80
           [<ffffffff814d7112>] usb_autopm_get_interface+0x22/0x60
           [<ffffffffa05d4cf0>] rtl_work_func_t+0x40/0x3ee [r8152]
           [<ffffffff8107822d>] process_one_work+0x1ed/0x660
           [<ffffffff810786ee>] worker_thread+0x4e/0x450
           [<ffffffff8107f13f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
           [<ffffffff81670b4f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70

    other info that might help us debug this:

     Possible unsafe locking scenario:

           CPU0                    CPU1
           ----                    ----
      lock((&(&tp->schedule)->work));
                                   lock(&tp->control);
                                   lock((&(&tp->schedule)->work));
      lock(&tp->control);

     *** DEADLOCK ***

    2 locks held by kworker/0:1/38:
     #0:  ("events"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8107819c>] process_one_work+0x15c/0x660
     #1:  ((&(&tp->schedule)->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8107819c>] process_one_work+0x15c/0x660

    stack backtrace:
    CPU: 0 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G           O    4.3.0-custom #1
    Hardware name: CLEVO CO.                        B7130                           /B7130                           , BIOS 6.00 08/27/2010
    Workqueue: events rtl_work_func_t [r8152]
     ffffffff8264d7d0 ffff8802321ff950 ffffffff8134cdac ffffffff8264d7d0
     ffff8802321ff990 ffffffff810adbb3 ffff8802321ff9e0 ffff8802320e50b8
     0000000000000002 0000000000000001 ffff8802320e50e0 ffff8802320e4880
    Call Trace:
     [<ffffffff8134cdac>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82
     [<ffffffff810adbb3>] print_circular_bug+0x1e3/0x250
     [<ffffffff810b0ed7>] __lock_acquire+0x1a47/0x1a50
     [<ffffffff810c505d>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20
     [<ffffffff810b17d3>] lock_acquire+0xc3/0x1d0
     [<ffffffffa05d3544>] ? rtl8152_resume+0x24/0x130 [r8152]
     [<ffffffffa05d3544>] ? rtl8152_resume+0x24/0x130 [r8152]
     [<ffffffff8166c0a7>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0
     [<ffffffffa05d3544>] ? rtl8152_resume+0x24/0x130 [r8152]
     [<ffffffff8166d7be>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
     [<ffffffff814d8680>] ? usb_runtime_suspend+0x70/0x70
     [<ffffffffa05d3544>] rtl8152_resume+0x24/0x130 [r8152]
     [<ffffffff814d735f>] usb_resume_interface.isra.6+0x9f/0x100
     [<ffffffff814d75fa>] usb_resume_both+0x6a/0x130
     [<ffffffff814d869a>] usb_runtime_resume+0x1a/0x20
     [<ffffffff814602c2>] __rpm_callback+0x32/0x70
     [<ffffffff8146035f>] rpm_callback+0x5f/0x80
     [<ffffffff814d8680>] ? usb_runtime_suspend+0x70/0x70
     [<ffffffff81460c4b>] rpm_resume+0x4db/0x7d0
     [<ffffffff81460b0c>] rpm_resume+0x39c/0x7d0
     [<ffffffff8146211e>] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4e/0x80
     [<ffffffff814d7112>] usb_autopm_get_interface+0x22/0x60
     [<ffffffffa05d4cf0>] rtl_work_func_t+0x40/0x3ee [r8152]
     [<ffffffff8107822d>] process_one_work+0x1ed/0x660
     [<ffffffff8107819c>] ? process_one_work+0x15c/0x660
     [<ffffffff810786ee>] worker_thread+0x4e/0x450
     [<ffffffff810786a0>] ? process_one_work+0x660/0x660
     [<ffffffff8107f13f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
     [<ffffffff8107f050>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x200/0x200
     [<ffffffff81670b4f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
     [<ffffffff8107f050>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x200/0x200

Hung task message in the VM after "ip link set eth1 up"

    INFO: task kworker/1:1:27 blocked for more than 60 seconds.
          Not tainted 4.4.0-rc3-rtlwifi+ #9
    "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
    kworker/1:1     D ffff88000de8bca0     0    27      2 0x00000000
    Workqueue: events linkwatch_event
     ffff88000de8bca0 ffff88000de78808 000000000de8bc98 ffff88000dcd0000
     ffff88000de78000 ffff88000de8c000 0000000000000246 ffffffff81ceb428
     ffff88000de78000 00000000ffffffff ffff88000de8bcb8 ffffffff8173a23c
    Call Trace:
     [<ffffffff8173a23c>] schedule+0x3c/0x90
     [<ffffffff8173a2a5>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x20
     [<ffffffff8173b9dc>] mutex_lock_nested+0x16c/0x390
     [<ffffffff815c9cd7>] ? rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
     [<ffffffff815c9cd7>] ? rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
     [<ffffffff815c9cd7>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
     [<ffffffff815cd80e>] linkwatch_event+0xe/0x30
     [<ffffffff810c22f7>] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x640
     [<ffffffff810c226c>] ? process_one_work+0x16c/0x640
     [<ffffffff810c278e>] worker_thread+0x4e/0x450
     [<ffffffff810c2740>] ? process_one_work+0x640/0x640
     [<ffffffff810c2740>] ? process_one_work+0x640/0x640
     [<ffffffff810c97c2>] kthread+0xf2/0x110
     [<ffffffff810c96d0>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x90/0x90
     [<ffffffff81740bbf>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
     [<ffffffff810c96d0>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x90/0x90
    3 locks held by kworker/1:1/27:
     #0:  ("events"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810c226c>] process_one_work+0x16c/0x640
     #1:  ((linkwatch_work).work){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff810c226c>] process_one_work+0x16c/0x640
     #2:  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815c9cd7>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-07  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-05 10:59 (4.3.0) r8152: deadlock related to runtime suspend? Peter Wu
2015-12-05 10:59 ` Peter Wu
2015-12-07  9:11 ` Lu Baolu
2015-12-07  9:37   ` Peter Wu [this message]
2015-12-07 11:08     ` Lu Baolu
2015-12-07 11:22       ` Peter Wu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-22 16:02 Niccolò Belli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151207093755.GA4283@al \
    --to=peter@lekensteyn.nl \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hayeswang@realtek.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.