Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/11] Add basic "detach" support for dump-guest-memory

[Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:13:02PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/06/2015 10:56 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > - patch 8
> >   - add "DumpQueryResult" in DUMP_COMPLETED event [Eric]
> >     (since DumpQueryResult is introduced in patch 10, so doing it in
> >     patch 10 for convenience. Please let me know if I should not do
> >     this, e.g., if patch re-ordering is required)
> 
> All patches should build in isolation.  It looks like you met that goal
> (you introduce 'DUMP_COMPLETED' event in 8 without a 'result' member,
> then modify it in 10), so that it at least builds.  But it results in
> churn, in that you have multiple different definitions of
> 'DUMP_COMPLETED' over the life of the series.
> 
> It's not a requirement to rework things since each step builds, but if I
> were writing the series, I do find it conceptually easier to supply
> patches in an order that minimizes churn (the first patch that
> introduces a type uses its final form, rather than going through several
> iterations of that type).  So on that grounds, introducing
> DumpQueryResult as a separate patch, before either DUMP_COMPLETED or
> query-dump, might be easier to review, if there is a reason for a v6 spin.

Yes, it's harder for review. Sorry for that.

I think there should have a v6 spin, I will put DUMP_COMPLETE patch
to the end of the patch set.

Thanks.
Peter