All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][experimantal] cpufreq: governor: Use an atomic variable for synchronization
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:26:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208145658.GG3692@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1843141.WbisoTkq1u@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 08-12-15, 15:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> It doesn't look nice, but then having a lockless timer function is worth
> it in my view.
> 
> The code in gov_cancel_work() runs relatively rarely, but the timer
> function can run very often, so avoiding the lock in there is a priority
> to me.
> 
> Plus we can avoid disabling interrupts in two places this way.

Okay, that's good enough then. I hope you will be sending these
patches now, right? And ofcourse, we need documentation in this case
as well.

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-08 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-03  4:07 [PATCH V2 0/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] cpufreq: ondemand: Update sampling rate only for concerned policies Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] cpufreq: ondemand: Work is guaranteed to be pending Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] cpufreq: governor: Pass policy as argument to ->gov_dbs_timer() Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] cpufreq: governor: initialize/destroy timer_mutex with 'shared' Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-04  1:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-04  6:11     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-05  2:14       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-05  4:10         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-07  1:28           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-07  7:50             ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-07 22:43               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-07 23:17                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-08  0:39                   ` [PATCH][experimantal] cpufreq: governor: Use an atomic variable for synchronization Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-08  6:59                     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08 13:30                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-08 13:36                         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08 14:19                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-08 13:55                             ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08 14:30                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-08 14:56                                 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-12-08 16:42                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-08 16:34                                     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08  6:46                   ` [PATCH V2 5/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08  6:56                 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08 13:18                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-08 13:30                     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08 14:04                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-04  6:13   ` [PATCH V3 " Viresh Kumar
2015-12-04  6:13     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-09  2:04     ` [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2015-12-09  2:04       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-09 22:06       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-10  2:36         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-10 22:17           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-11  1:42             ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] cpufreq: ondemand: update update_sampling_rate() to make it more efficient Viresh Kumar
2015-12-03  4:07   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151208145658.GG3692@ubuntu \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.