All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qom: change object property iterator API contract
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:29:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151209122909.GC19914@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5666FFE0.10703@redhat.com>

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:05:52AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/27/2015 08:27 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Currently the object property iterator API works as follows
> > 
> >   ObjectPropertyIterator *iter;
> > 
> >   iter = object_property_iter_init(obj);
> >   while ((prop = object_property_iter_next(iter))) {
> >      ...
> >   }
> >   object_property_iter_free(iter);
> > 
> > This has the benefit that the ObjectPropertyIterator struct
> > can be opaque, but has the downside that callers need to
> > explicitly call a free function. It is also not in keeping
> > with iterator style used elsewhere in QEMU/glib2
> > 
> > This patch changes the API to use stack allocation instead
> > 
> >   ObjectPropertyIterator iter;
> > 
> >   object_property_iter_init(&iter, obj);
> >   while ((prop = object_property_iter_next(&iter))) {
> >      ...
> >   }
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > NB, this patch is not against master, it is intended to apply
> > after
> > 
> >   "qom: allow properties to be registered against classes"
> > 
> > which is queued in qom-next for 2.6
> > 
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c         |  7 +++----
> >  include/qom/object.h       | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  net/filter.c               |  7 +++----
> >  qmp.c                      | 14 ++++++--------
> >  qom/object.c               | 22 ++++------------------
> >  tests/check-qom-proplist.c |  7 +++----
> >  vl.c                       |  7 +++----
> >  7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> > +++ b/include/qom/object.h
> > @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ typedef struct ObjectProperty
> >      void *opaque;
> >  } ObjectProperty;
> >  
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * ObjectUnparent:
> >   * @obj: the object that is being removed from the composition tree
> 
> Spurious whitespace change?
> 
> 
> >  
> > + /**
> > + * object_property_iter_free:
> > + * @iter: the iterator instance
> > + *
> > + * Releases any resources associated with the iterator. It is
> > + * not necessary to call this method if object_property_iter_next
> > + * has returned %NULL. It is only required if an application wishes
> > + * to abort iteration before it is complete
> > + */
> > +void object_property_iter_free(ObjectPropertyIterator *iter);
> > +
> 
> Huh? Why is this being added?  I thought the point was to get rid of the
> need for object_property_iter_free().

Yeh, forgot to remove the header declaration.

> 
> > +++ b/qom/object.c
> > @@ -67,11 +67,6 @@ struct TypeImpl
> 
> Other than that snafu, everything else looked fine.   If that's all you
> fix for v2, you can add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

Ok, thanks for the review


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-09 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-27 15:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qom: change object property iterator API contract Daniel P. Berrange
2015-12-08 16:05 ` Eric Blake
2015-12-09 12:29   ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151209122909.GC19914@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.