From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] OOM detection rework v3
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:42:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151211084233.GA32318@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448974607-10208-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>
Hi,
are there any fundamental objections to the new approach? I am very well
aware that this is not a small change and it will take some time to
settle but can we move on and get this to mmotm tree (and linux-next) so
that it gets a larger test coverage. I do not think this is a material
for the next merge window. Maybe 4.6?
What do you think?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-11 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 12:56 [RFC 0/3] OOM detection rework v3 Michal Hocko
2015-12-01 12:56 ` [RFC 1/3] mm, oom: refactor oom detection Michal Hocko
2015-12-11 16:16 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-14 18:34 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-01 12:56 ` [RFC 2/3] mm: throttle on IO only when there are too many dirty and writeback pages Michal Hocko
2015-12-02 7:09 ` Hillf Danton
2015-12-11 16:25 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-01 12:56 ` [RFC 3/3] mm: use watermak checks for __GFP_REPEAT high order allocations Michal Hocko
2015-12-02 7:07 ` Hillf Danton
2015-12-02 8:52 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-11 8:42 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151211084233.GA32318@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.