All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:16:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151211171659.GA1135@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151211144313.GD8811@breakpoint.cc>

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 03:43:13PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> > Ulrich reports soft lockup with following (shortened) callchain:
> > 
> > NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s!
> > __netif_receive_skb_core+0x6e4/0x774
> > process_backlog+0x94/0x160
> > net_rx_action+0x88/0x178
> > call_do_softirq+0x24/0x3c
> > do_softirq+0x54/0x6c
> > __local_bh_enable_ip+0x7c/0xbc
> > nf_ct_iterate_cleanup+0x11c/0x22c [nf_conntrack]
> > masq_inet_event+0x20/0x30 [nf_nat_masquerade_ipv6]
> > atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x1c/0x2c
> > ipv6_del_addr+0x1bc/0x220 [ipv6]
> > 
> > Problem is that nf_ct_iterate_cleanup can run for a very long time
> > since it can be interrupted by softirq processing.
> > Moreover, atomic_notifier_call_chain runs with rcu readlock held.
> 
> Ulrich just reported another softlockup even with this patch applied.
> 
> One explanation would be non-matching iter(), in this case
> get_next_corpse can take forever since it will walk the entire conntrack
> table, rendering the cond_resched moot.

Probably another reincarnation of 0838aa7fcfcd? Is Ulrich using
conntrack templates?

> A V2 patch will be coming to also add a lock break + resched to
> get_next_corpse.

BTW, the atomic chain notifier in IPv6 seems to be there to handle
this update from the packet path:

 ndisc_rcv()
 ndisc_router_discovery()
 addrconf_prefix_rcv()
 manage_tempaddrs()
 ipv6_add_addr()
 inet6addr_notifier_call_chain()

Probably we can get Hannes have a look into this, I think we can
convert this chain to blocking one through workqueue since
addrconf_prefix_rcv() returns void. The remaining call sites of
inet6addr_notifier_call_chain() that I could tracked come from paths
where I can see ASSERT_RTNL(), so user context is guaranteed.

I'm telling this become I remember that we discussed in netconf'14
Chicago that it would be good to get rid of this kind og asymmetries
between IPv4 and IPv6.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-11 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-09 17:30 [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup Florian Westphal
2015-12-11 11:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-12-11 11:53   ` Florian Westphal
2015-12-11 14:43 ` Florian Westphal
2015-12-11 17:16   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2015-12-11 17:21     ` Florian Westphal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-20 10:16 Florian Westphal
2016-02-01 17:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151211171659.GA1135@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.