From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: Linux 4.3.1 regression: -m state returns "Protocol wrong type for socket" Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 00:20:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20151212232044.GE12854@breakpoint.cc> References: <566BEF33.7090501@gmail.com> <566C09F5.6080606@gmail.com> <566C0E75.6080800@familie-kuntze.de> <566c4622.936d810a.ece67.ffffdfc9@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <566c4622.936d810a.ece67.ffffdfc9@mx.google.com> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?D=E2niel?= Fraga Cc: Noel Kuntze , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Remzi =?iso-8859-15?Q?AKY=DCZ?= , netfilter@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org D=E2niel Fraga wrote: > iptables -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEP= T >=20 > And I got the same error: >=20 > iptables: Protocol wrong type for socket. >=20 > I'm afraid something has changed between 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 kernel > and some module isn't loading correctly. Here are the loaded modules: >=20 > xt_conntrack 3401 0=20 > x_tables 15108 7 xt_comment,ip_tables,xt_tcpudp,xt_con= ntrack,xt_LOG,iptable_filter,ipt_REJECT > nf_conntrack_ftp 6750 0=20 > nf_conntrack 56108 2 xt_conntrack,nf_conntrack_ftp >=20 > Is there something missing? Yes: nf_conntrack_ipv4