From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dennis Dalessandro Subject: Re: [PATCH 37/37] IB/rdmavt: Add support for new memory registration API Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:14:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20151214171440.GC23833@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> References: <20151207204046.8144.18752.stgit@phlsvslse11.ph.intel.com> <20151207204540.8144.94303.stgit@phlsvslse11.ph.intel.com> <5669940D.4040402@dev.mellanox.co.il> <566EEBE8.8020007@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <566EEBE8.8020007-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ira Weiny List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:18:48PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >>This question is not directly related to this patch, but given that >>this is a copy-paste from the qib driver I'll go ahead and take it >>anyway. How does qib (and rvt now) do memory key invalidation? I didn't >>see any reference to IB_WR_LOCAL_INV anywhere in the qib driver... >> >>What am I missing? > >ping? In short, it doesn't look like qib or hfi1 support this. That doesn't mean it can't be added to rdmavt as a future enhancement though if there is a need. Are you asking because soft-roce will need it? -Denny -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html