From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 0/6] Improve the output of test runners
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:10:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215131057.GC20852@potion.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151214222000.GG3633@hawk.localdomain>
2015-12-14 16:20-0600, Andrew Jones:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:24:15PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> > skip vmx (0 tests, 0 unexpected failures)
>> > PASS debug (7 tests, 0 unexpected failures)
>> > qemu-kvm: Property '.hv-synic' not found
>> > skip hyperv_synic (failed $(echo quit | $qemu -enable-kvm -cpu kvm64,hv_synic -device hyperv-testdev -monitor stdio > /dev/null))
>
> I'm not sure I like the (summary) addition. A summary of why we skip
> would be useful, like the (i386 only) stuff, but otherwise it doesn't
> seem necessary, and the "(failed $(echo quit | $qemu -enable-kvm -cpu
> kvm64,hv_synic -device hyperv-testdev -monitor stdio > /dev/null))"
> summary is a bit ugly, wrapping on many terminals.
The summary should help to make callers more certain of what happened
without spending time with tests.log.
I'd like the summary more if we didn't print "0 unexpected failures" in
passing/skipped cases, so maybe we can agree on that?
I'll shorten the failed case.
> Another comment that is series wide is that all these changes need to be
> tested with 'make standalone' (and many of your patches will require
> changes to scripts/mkstandalone.sh, for which you will never forgive
> me for having written :-)
First time I heard about it. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-14 21:24 [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 0/6] Improve the output of test runners Radim Krčmář
2015-12-14 21:24 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 1/6] lib/report: allow test skipping Radim Krčmář
2015-12-14 22:00 ` Andrew Jones
2015-12-14 22:12 ` Andrew Jones
2015-12-15 12:54 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-12-14 21:24 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 2/6] x86/*: report skipped tests Radim Krčmář
2015-12-14 22:07 ` Andrew Jones
2015-12-15 12:58 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-12-14 21:24 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 3/6] x86/pmu: expect failure with nmi_watchdog Radim Krčmář
2015-12-14 22:05 ` Andrew Jones
2015-12-15 13:01 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-12-15 15:33 ` Andrew Jones
2015-12-14 21:24 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 4/6] run_tests: generalize check Radim Krčmář
2015-12-14 22:11 ` Andrew Jones
2015-12-15 13:05 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-12-14 21:24 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 5/6] x86/hyperv_synic: check for support before testing Radim Krčmář
2015-12-14 21:24 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 6/6] run_tests: print summary Radim Krčmář
2015-12-14 22:20 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 0/6] Improve the output of test runners Andrew Jones
2015-12-15 13:10 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2015-12-15 10:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-12-15 13:13 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-12-15 15:37 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151215131057.GC20852@potion.brq.redhat.com \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.