From: Paul Barker <paul.barker@commagility.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] module.bbclass: Fix potential do_compile/do_make_scripts race condition
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:04:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215140434.75233de0@centos-7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449401194-31567-1-git-send-email-paul.barker@commagility.com>
On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 11:26:33 +0000
Paul Barker <paul.barker@commagility.com> wrote:
> I ran into a race condition building multiple external modules against a 3.10.y
> series kernel using the dylan branch of OpenEmbedded. This is difficult to
> reproduce as it requires very specific timing: the do_make_scripts task for one
> module was linking the modpost script whilst the do_compile task for another
> module was attempting to use the modpost script. This resulted in a permission
> error:
>
> ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/work/amc_d24a4-oe-linux-gnueabi/ti-hplib-mod/01.01.00.04-r3d/temp/log.do_compile.25434 for further information)
> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/work/amc_d24a4-oe-linux-gnueabi/ti-hplib-mod/01.01.00.04-r3d/temp/log.do_compile.25434
> Log data follows:
> | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile
> | make -C /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel M=$PWD clean
> | make[1]: Entering directory `/home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel'
> | make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel'
> | make -C /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel M=$PWD modules
> | make[1]: Entering directory `/home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel'
> | CC [M] /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/work/amc_d24a4-oe-linux-gnueabi/ti-hplib-mod/01.01.00.04-r3d/git/ti/runtime/hplib/module/hplibmod.o
> | Building modules, stage 2.
> | MODPOST 1 modules
> | /bin/sh: scripts/mod/modpost: Permission denied
> | make[2]: *** [__modpost] Error 126
> | make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
> | make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel'
> | make: *** [default] Error 2
> | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/work/amc_d24a4-oe-linux-gnueabi/ti-hplib-mod/01.01.00.04-r3d/temp/log.do_compile.25434 for further information)
> ERROR: Task 1284 (/home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/meta-mcsdk/meta-arago-extras/recipes-bsp/ti-hplib/ti-hplib-mod_git.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code '1'
>
> Later kernel versions do not rebuild the modpost script every time that 'make
> scripts' is invoked so they should be safe from this particular failure. However
> I'm not convinced that running 'make scripts' whilst also building an
> out-of-tree module is always safe on later kernels and there is always the
> potential for vendor kernels to have different behaviour here.
>
> Although this was seen on the dylan branch the behaviour of master and jethro
> looks to be the same here - do_make_scripts is locked so that only one instance
> of it may run at one time but there is nothing to prevent one instance of
> do_make_scripts running at the same time as an instance of do_compile.
>
> The patch I'm sending attempts to solve this issue by locking the do_compile
> task with the same lockfile as the do_make_scripts task in module.bbclass so
> that an instance of do_copile can't run at the same time as an instance of
> do_make_scripts. I don't know enough about the task locking to guarantee that
> this is the right solution or to be able to test that it works as expected so
> I'm marking the patch as an RFC.
>
> Please let me know if this is the right approach and if there is any easy way to
> test this.
>
> Paul Barker (1):
> module.bbclass: Fix potential do_compile/do_make_scripts race
> condition
>
> meta/classes/module.bbclass | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
ping on this.
I've just got bitten by this again so it's not a one-off. Is anyone able to
give me some feedback on the patch, whether this is the right approach to fix
the problem and whether this is applicable to jethro/master.
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
CommAgility Ltd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-06 11:26 [PATCH RFC] module.bbclass: Fix potential do_compile/do_make_scripts race condition Paul Barker
2015-12-06 11:26 ` Paul Barker
2015-12-15 14:04 ` Paul Barker [this message]
2015-12-15 14:42 ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-05-08 10:29 ` Mike Crowe
2017-05-14 9:07 ` Mike Crowe
2018-03-28 8:24 ` Javier Viguera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151215140434.75233de0@centos-7 \
--to=paul.barker@commagility.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.