From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com, patches.audio@intel.com,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Jeeja KP <jeeja.kp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: core: Adds support for cpu loopback dai_link
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:18:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151216144806.GO1854@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202103241.GC1929@sirena.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1012 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:32:41AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:53:30AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> > But if we do wrt from CPU the situation is different
>
> > CPU Tx (Pb) -----------> Codec Tx (Pb)
> > CPU Rx (Cap) <----------- Codec Rx (Cap)
>
> > Since this follows normal playback kind of scenario, we need to link pb-pb
> > and cap-cap
>
> But neither of these is a CODEC so why would the CODEC flag be set in
> the DAI? Unless your "Codec" here is genuinely the CODEC rather than
> the CPU DAI connected to the CODEC in which case surely this is just a
> normal DAI link?
Sorry Mark for late reply..
You are right this is like a normal link, and yes that is _exactly_ we need,
but we also need parameters to be specified for this as this is hostless.
The moment I add 'params" core will do different connections which do not
work for us.
I am okay if you have something else in mind which solves our problem :)
Thanks
--
~Vinod
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-09 17:49 [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: core: Update for DSP systems Vinod Koul
2015-11-09 17:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: core: refactor soc_link_dai_widgets() Vinod Koul
2015-11-18 13:13 ` Applied "ASoC: core: refactor soc_link_dai_widgets()" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2015-11-09 17:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: core: Adds support for cpu loopback dai_link Vinod Koul
2015-11-18 13:17 ` Mark Brown
2015-11-18 13:48 ` Vinod Koul
2015-11-25 16:13 ` Vinod Koul
2015-11-30 16:25 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-01 2:56 ` Vinod Koul
2015-12-01 12:27 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-02 5:23 ` Vinod Koul
2015-12-02 10:32 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-16 14:48 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2015-12-30 18:03 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-04 15:42 ` Vinod Koul
2015-11-09 17:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: core: Pass kcontrol to bytes tlv callbacks Vinod Koul
2015-11-18 13:13 ` Applied "ASoC: core: Pass kcontrol to bytes tlv callbacks" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2015-11-09 17:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: topology: fix info callback for TLV byte control Vinod Koul
2015-11-18 13:13 ` Applied "ASoC: topology: fix info callback for TLV byte control" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151216144806.GO1854@localhost \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jeeja.kp@intel.com \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=patches.audio@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.