From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/efi: show actual ending addresses in efi_print_memmap Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:06:29 +0000 Message-ID: <20151221160629.GF4227@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1450402114-3606-1-git-send-email-elliott@hpe.com> <1450402114-3606-2-git-send-email-elliott@hpe.com> <20151221155038.GD4227@codeblueprint.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151221155038.GD4227-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Robert Elliott Cc: tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org, mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 21 Dec, at 03:50:38PM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec, at 07:28:31PM, Robert Elliott wrote: > > Adjust efi_print_memmap to print the real end address of each > > range, not 1 byte beyond. This matches other prints like those for > > SRAT and nosave memory. > > > > Change the closing ) to ] to match the opening [. > > > > old: > > efi: mem61: [Persistent Memory | | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000880000000-0x0000000c80000000) (16384MB) > > > > new: > > efi: mem61: [Persistent Memory | | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] range=[0x0000000880000000-0x0000000c7fffffff] (16384MB) > > > > Example other address range prints: > > SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x480000000-0x87fffffff] > > PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0x880000000-0xc7fffffff] > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Elliott > > --- > > arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Is this change purely for aesthetic reasons? We're usually not in the > habit of changing the output of print messages without a good reason > because people downstream do rely on them being consistent. I just noticed the bracket change. My comment above only refers to printing the range addresses. Swapping ')' for ']' is a perfectly valid change.