From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: chengang@emindsoft.com.cn
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: rcu: tree: Remove useless rcu_data_p when !PREEMPT_RCU
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:26:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160104212604.GG32217@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451137304-23207-1-git-send-email-chengang@emindsoft.com.cn>
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 09:41:44PM +0800, chengang@emindsoft.com.cn wrote:
> From: Chen Gang <chengang@emindsoft.com.cn>
>
> The related warning from gcc 6.0:
>
> In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:4630:0:
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:810:40: warning: ‘rcu_data_p’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable]
> static struct rcu_data __percpu *const rcu_data_p = &rcu_sched_data;
> ^~~~~~~~~~
>
> Also remove always redundant rcu_data_p in tree.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Queued for review and testing, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 1 -
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 3a8856f..ed85d66 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_sched, 's', call_rcu_sched);
> RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_bh, 'b', call_rcu_bh);
>
> static struct rcu_state *const rcu_state_p;
> -static struct rcu_data __percpu *const rcu_data_p;
> LIST_HEAD(rcu_struct_flavors);
>
> /* Dump rcu_node combining tree at boot to verify correct setup. */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 9467a8b..e6b88ad 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -807,7 +807,6 @@ void exit_rcu(void)
> #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
>
> static struct rcu_state *const rcu_state_p = &rcu_sched_state;
> -static struct rcu_data __percpu *const rcu_data_p = &rcu_sched_data;
>
> /*
> * Tell them what RCU they are running.
> --
> 1.9.3
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-04 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-26 13:41 [PATCH] kernel: rcu: tree: Remove useless rcu_data_p when !PREEMPT_RCU chengang
2016-01-04 21:26 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160104212604.GG32217@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=chengang@emindsoft.com.cn \
--cc=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.