All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] X.509: Don't check the signature on apparently self-signed keys [ver #2]
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:00:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160105170052.GB28071@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2752.1452012031@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

On 16-01-05 16:40:31, David Howells wrote:
> Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > You're missing Petko's patch:
> > 41c89b6 IMA: create machine owner and blacklist keyrings
> 
> It should also be cc'd to the keyrings mailing list.

Right.

If i am not terribly mistaken there's no way to revoke a certificate that is in 
a CA hierarchy with the system keyring on top of it.  Certain scenarios require 
us to revoke them as it was presented at the last year's LSS.

If x509_key_preparse() is not the right place then where shall i place the 
check?


		Petko

      reply	other threads:[~2016-01-05 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-05 15:47 [RFC PATCH] X.509: Don't check the signature on apparently self-signed keys [ver #2] David Howells
2016-01-05 15:55 ` David Howells
2016-01-05 16:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-05 16:39   ` David Howells
2016-01-06 12:22     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-06 13:21       ` David Howells
2016-01-06 14:03         ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-06 14:19           ` David Howells
2016-01-06 17:00         ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-05 16:40   ` David Howells
2016-01-05 17:00     ` Petko Manolov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160105170052.GB28071@localhost \
    --to=petkan@mip-labs.com \
    --cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.