From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51088 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932092AbcAHI0G (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2016 03:26:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:26:01 +0100 From: Benjamin Tissoires To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Greg KH , Mika Westerberg , stable , Josh Boyer Subject: Re: backport 6d4f5440a3a2 to 4.3? Message-ID: <20160108082601.GC29113@mail.corp.redhat.com> References: <20160107201851.GA1766@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Jan 07 2016 or thereabouts, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 12:09:34PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> Hi, Mika and Greg- > >> > >> Should this commit: > >> > >> commit 6d4f5440a3a2bb2e9d0d582bbf98234e9e9bb095 > >> Author: Mika Westerberg > >> Date: Wed Oct 7 15:33:43 2015 +0300 > >> > >> HID: multitouch: Fetch feature reports on demand for Win8 devices > >> > >> be backported to 4.3? > >> > >> AFAICT the issue affects a range of Skylake systems, but only on Linux > >> 4.3, because 4.2 and below don't have the intel_lpss driver and end up > >> driving the pad in compatibility mode, which isn't affected. > > > > Looks reasonable to me, is it a clean "cherry-pick"? > > It is, and I've even tested it on a 4.3 kernel on my laptop. > > I'd prefer to get either Mika or Benjamin's ok first, though. > I think we are safe with 4.3 with this one. We limited the scope of it and made tests on a few hardwares when testing upstream. It was submitted during 4.3 rc cycles, so that's why it's in 4.4 and not 4.3. Backport-Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires Cheers, Benjamin