All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] slub: cleanup code for kmem cgroup support to kmem_cache_free_bulk
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:05:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160108120514.22798bf5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160108025839.GB14457@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>

On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:58:39 +0900
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:03:38PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > This change is primarily an attempt to make it easier to realize the
> > optimizations the compiler performs in-case CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is not
> > enabled.
> > 
> > Performance wise, even when CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is compiled in, the
> > overhead is zero. This is because, as long as no process have
> > enabled kmem cgroups accounting, the assignment is replaced by
> > asm-NOP operations.  This is possible because memcg_kmem_enabled()
> > uses a static_key_false() construct.
> > 
> > It also helps readability as it avoid accessing the p[] array like:
> > p[size - 1] which "expose" that the array is processed backwards
> > inside helper function build_detached_freelist().
> 
> That part is cleande up but overall code doesn't looks readable to me.

True, I also don't like my "*s" indirection, even-though it gets removed
in the compiled code.

> How about below change?

Looks more C readable, but I have to verify that the compiler can still
realize the optimization, of just using "s" directly, when
CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is not activated.  

> ---------------------->8------------------
>  struct detached_freelist {
> +       struct kmem_cache *s;
>         struct page *page;
>         void *tail;
>         void *freelist;
>         int cnt;
>  }

I'll likely place "s" at another point, as 16 bytes alignment of this
struct can influence performance on Intel CPUs.  (e.g. freelist+cnt
gets updated at almost the same time, and were 16 bytes aligned before)


> @@ -2852,8 +2853,11 @@ static int build_detached_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size,
>         if (!object)
>                 return 0;
>  
> +       /* Support for memcg */
> +       df->s = cache_from_obj(s, object);
> +
>         /* Start new detached freelist */
> -       set_freepointer(s, object, NULL);
> +       set_freepointer(df.s, object, NULL);

Not compile tested ;-) ... df->s

>         df->page = virt_to_head_page(object);
>         df->tail = object;
>         df->freelist = object;
> @@ -2868,7 +2872,7 @@ static int build_detached_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size,
>                 /* df->page is always set at this point */
>                 if (df->page == virt_to_head_page(object)) {
>                         /* Opportunity build freelist */
> -                       set_freepointer(s, object, df->freelist);
> +                       set_freepointer(df.s, object, df->freelist);
>                         df->freelist = object;
>                         df->cnt++;
>                         p[size] = NULL; /* mark object processed */
> @@ -2889,23 +2893,19 @@ static int build_detached_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size,
>  
>  
>  /* Note that interrupts must be enabled when calling this function. */
> -void kmem_cache_free_bulk(struct kmem_cache *orig_s, size_t size, void **p)
> +void kmem_cache_free_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, void **p)
>  {
>         if (WARN_ON(!size))
>                 return;
>  
>         do {
>                 struct detached_freelist df;
> -               struct kmem_cache *s;
> -
> -               /* Support for memcg */
> -               s = cache_from_obj(orig_s, p[size - 1]);
>  
>                 size = build_detached_freelist(s, size, p, &df);
>                 if (unlikely(!df.page))
>                         continue;
>  
> -               slab_free(s, df.page, df.freelist, df.tail, df.cnt, _RET_IP_);
> +               slab_free(df.s, df.page, df.freelist, df.tail, df.cnt, _RET_IP_);

Argh... line will be 81 chars wide...

>         } while (likely(size));
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_free_bulk);

I'll try it out. Thanks for your suggestion.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-08 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-07 14:03 [PATCH 00/10] MM: More bulk API work Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-07 14:03 ` [PATCH 01/10] slub: cleanup code for kmem cgroup support to kmem_cache_free_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-07 15:54   ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-07 17:41     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-08  2:58   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-01-08 11:05     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2016-01-07 14:03 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm/slab: move SLUB alloc hooks to common mm/slab.h Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-07 14:03 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: fault-inject take over bootstrap kmem_cache check Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-07 14:03 ` [PATCH 04/10] slab: use slab_pre_alloc_hook in SLAB allocator shared with SLUB Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-08  3:05   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-01-07 14:03 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: kmemcheck skip object if slab allocation failed Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-07 14:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] slab: use slab_post_alloc_hook in SLAB allocator shared with SLUB Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-07 14:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] slab: implement bulk alloc in SLAB allocator Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-07 14:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] slab: avoid running debug SLAB code with IRQs disabled for alloc_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-07 14:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] slab: implement bulk free in SLAB allocator Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-07 14:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: new API kfree_bulk() for SLAB+SLUB allocators Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-08  3:03   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-01-08 11:20     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-07 18:54 ` [PATCH 00/10] MM: More bulk API work Linus Torvalds
2016-01-12 15:13 ` [PATCH V2 00/11] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:13   ` [PATCH V2 01/11] slub: cleanup code for kmem cgroup support to kmem_cache_free_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:13   ` [PATCH V2 02/11] mm/slab: move SLUB alloc hooks to common mm/slab.h Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:14   ` [PATCH V2 03/11] mm: fault-inject take over bootstrap kmem_cache check Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:14   ` [PATCH V2 04/11] slab: use slab_pre_alloc_hook in SLAB allocator shared with SLUB Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:14   ` [PATCH V2 05/11] mm: kmemcheck skip object if slab allocation failed Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:14   ` [PATCH V2 06/11] slab: use slab_post_alloc_hook in SLAB allocator shared with SLUB Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:15   ` [PATCH V2 07/11] slab: implement bulk alloc in SLAB allocator Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:15   ` [PATCH V2 08/11] slab: avoid running debug SLAB code with IRQs disabled for alloc_bulk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:15   ` [PATCH V2 09/11] slab: implement bulk free in SLAB allocator Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:16   ` [PATCH V2 10/11] mm: new API kfree_bulk() for SLAB+SLUB allocators Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-01-12 15:16   ` [PATCH V2 11/11] mm: fix some spelling Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160108120514.22798bf5@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.