All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:53:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160108155341.GC3818@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160108045453.GB4300@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com>

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:54:53PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 08:48:35PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:08:50PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:41:57 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Indeed, I suspect that SRCU might not be the only thing that would like
> > > > static per-CPU variables.  ;-)
> > > 
> > > from include/linux/percpu-defs.h:
> > > 
> > >  * s390 and alpha modules require percpu variables to be defined as
> > >  * weak to force the compiler to generate GOT based external
> > >  * references for them.  This is necessary because percpu sections
> > >  * will be located outside of the usually addressable area.
> > >  *
> > >  * This definition puts the following two extra restrictions when
> > >  * defining percpu variables.
> > >  *
> > >  * 1. The symbol must be globally unique, even the static ones.
> > >  * 2. Static percpu variables cannot be defined inside a function.
> > >  *
> > >  * Archs which need weak percpu definitions should define
> > >  * ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU in asm/percpu.h when necessary.
> > >  *
> > >  * To ensure that the generic code observes the above two
> > >  * restrictions, if CONFIG_DEBUG_FORCE_WEAK_PER_CPU is set weak
> > >  * definition is used for all cases.
> > > 
> > > so they can be static, but must be globally unique.
> 
> Interesting ;-) Thank you.
> 
> > Thank you for the tutorial!  I have updated the patch to use a unique
> > name for the srcu_struct added by rcuperf.c.
> 
> Plus a comment for DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU saying srcu can be defined as
> static but must have a unique name for this reason?

Yes, plus some words about how to work around the limitation.  How about
the patch below?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 61822ff81839ee3c5b6094ce348944d972b87892
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri Jan 8 07:43:50 2016 -0800

    rcu: Document unique-name limitation for DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU()
    
    SRCU uses per-CPU variables, and DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() uses a static
    per-CPU variable.  However, per-CPU variables have significant
    restrictions, for example, names of per-CPU variables must be globally
    unique, even if declared static.  These restrictions carry over to
    DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(), and this commit therefore documents these
    restrictions.
    
    Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
    Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
    Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index f5f80c5643ac..dc8eb63c6568 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -99,8 +99,23 @@ void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
 	}
 
 /*
- * define and init a srcu struct at build time.
- * dont't call init_srcu_struct() nor cleanup_srcu_struct() on it.
+ * Define and initialize a srcu struct at build time.
+ * Do -not- call init_srcu_struct() nor cleanup_srcu_struct() on it.
+ *
+ * Note that although DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() hides the name from other
+ * files, the per-CPU variable rules nevertheless require that the
+ * chosen name be globally unique.  These rules also prohibit use of
+ * DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() within a function.  If these rules are too
+ * restrictive, declare the srcu_struct manually.  For example, in
+ * each file:
+ *
+ *	static struct srcu_struct my_srcu;
+ *
+ * Then, before the first use of each my_srcu, manually initialize it:
+ *
+ *	init_srcu_struct(&my_srcu);
+ *
+ * See include/linux/percpu-defs.h for the rules on per-CPU variables.
  */
 #define __DEFINE_SRCU(name, is_static)					\
 	static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-08 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 156+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-07  8:57 linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-07 18:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-01-07 20:19   ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-07 20:52     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-01-08  1:37       ` Boqun Feng
2016-01-08  3:41         ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-01-08  4:08           ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-08  4:48             ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-01-08  4:54               ` Boqun Feng
2016-01-08 15:53                 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2016-01-08 15:57                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-01-08 16:18                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-01-08 15:58                   ` Boqun Feng
2016-01-08  4:10         ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-24  4:17 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-24  9:49 ` Jiri Wiesner
2024-01-24 12:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-24 13:31     ` Jiri Wiesner
2024-01-24 14:20       ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-07-27  4:19 Stephen Rothwell
2023-07-27 14:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-19  0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-19  2:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-22  1:45   ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-22 14:57     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-14  1:29 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-14  4:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-17 23:26 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-18 10:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-18 14:57   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-19  2:36 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-19  3:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-03  0:11 Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-03 16:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-22  4:10 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-22 16:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-17  5:36 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-17 14:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-04  0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-04 12:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-04  8:25 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-04 19:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-06 21:39   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-07  4:48     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-07  8:59       ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-17  5:19 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-17 22:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-18  0:00   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08  5:38 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 13:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-08-18  1:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-18 14:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-25  2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-25  3:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-28  9:05 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-28 16:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-28 21:03   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-04-05  1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-05  3:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-17  3:07 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-12  2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-12  4:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-12  4:26   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-12  4:41     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-17  3:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-13  7:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-13 15:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-12  6:12 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-12 16:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-13  5:25   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-13 14:38     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-04  4:50 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04 16:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-28  4:25 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-28 17:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-11  4:43 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-11  4:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-11  9:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-11 14:39     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-11 14:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-11 14:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-11 20:12       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-29  6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-29 21:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-30  1:40   ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-30  1:54     ` Joe Perches
2017-05-30  2:14       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-30  2:20         ` Joe Perches
2017-05-30  3:13           ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-30  4:10   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-02 17:51     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-20  5:36 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-20 14:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-19  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-19  4:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-19  5:45   ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08  1:16 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08  1:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08 10:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-03-08 10:13   ` Daniel Vetter
2017-03-08 17:40   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-08 17:40     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-19  3:34 Stephen Rothwell
2017-01-19 21:54 ` Paul McKenney
2017-02-13  2:21   ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-13  4:37     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-02-13  6:43       ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08  1:16         ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08  1:37           ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-08 18:05           ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-05-02  4:37 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-02 11:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-02-01  2:55 Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-01  9:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-01  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-01  7:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-02  3:58   ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-02  5:26     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-02  6:40       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-09-02  7:14         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-02  7:29           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-02  8:34             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-16  3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-16  3:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-16  5:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-17 11:40   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-17 17:35     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 18:53       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-17 19:51         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-17 21:33           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-18  2:40             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-13 10:39 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-13 11:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-04-13 11:34   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-13 12:40     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-27  2:18 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-27  5:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-26  7:51 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-26 16:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-27 16:24   ` Pranith Kumar
2014-12-27 17:20     ` Pranith Kumar
2014-12-31  1:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-12  6:12 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-12 17:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-10  8:09 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-10 15:03 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-12-10 15:18   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-09 11:42 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-09 14:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-16  4:11 Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-16 17:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-17  2:42 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-17  2:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-17  4:39 ` David Miller
2010-09-17  5:34   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-17 23:17 ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160108155341.GC3818@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.