From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 192B1E007EA; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:32:41 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [74.125.82.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com (mail-wm0-f65.google.com [74.125.82.65]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1C7E0070F for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:32:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id f206so27945988wmf.2 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:32:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gherzan-ro.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iE+zJsMuOtO3PR39nkxu8VFsz8blUpkGsyatjVfnl7E=; b=MMRf+RBj1m9RGmY6S1gLwdmYO4CaY5RBBUcaFhqH8iO4pWl27oEvDG2y9hkNoy9JKw fEBdaSmlsvN/QaNrOMzumfABdb5O28uB9GJEG3INMUpLtTxZnVIf5Z/PyU1Br74RpV/2 R1lULo0ykE9Z/vJ8H5e+Cb5p4yCWtRBjJJ2L2kEQKxm9kawzEKW0hh1SDnHzBIu9+7fH lBrbSZqGYJ1zAaxYPVcqRvksLC/lDTpSjP/dZxdTeVoTZT6zDCqRgAdMANNcSif2xKif hI9/SGzQiBcoLPW0DC57X9u3k/9Y0+GbGXhDABOSoAjokIyGTCNT+mLKzp4jpChgiF/1 ij4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iE+zJsMuOtO3PR39nkxu8VFsz8blUpkGsyatjVfnl7E=; b=d/Ujmif18fCTMq0QuA678U7Kgcb6/KRhmP6bZHHNL1PFcxdbfhgNA5gWEW9spl/Rmu SRhOjMrmTJFjRd0VpoqDa4AinkgHw8jUJSg0T6x+dCpFTiLjxqBalBOYe7fDRm0FxU5k JA4sl3+WrOMeQIop/ouolJ8oMWiSFNckdiF85Ca+NtZ8Meak3zLU3g6UgFjDDNhLI7aF olHhjC7ZtnXyJVtxPwTY/F7xtvXyQusqeyfV4fLNhglsPXaYhw3r6Jf7XudWgLWlAk2g 8th8ULb3BZ2KTfpeXM7gSADZkPhW/Oi/zSH/+tue1JhYhCxJWnK/WrBYuSuzgQS3Y/QO h/WA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCCqZ9mC73s+2BMvVP7hdIS7Ts7uhD299WyyRbMG/2/SG+QGzSvdatsSoeMGOzmvdQBiwpec8IUU8yCFH3e/qZ8X5cuA== X-Received: by 10.194.175.104 with SMTP id bz8mr3219646wjc.8.1452544355780; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:32:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from resin (dslb-178-007-064-118.178.007.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [178.7.64.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id df10sm106413231wjb.44.2016.01.11.12.32.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:32:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:32:27 +0100 From: Andrei Gherzan To: Khem Raj Message-ID: <20160111203227.GA10203@resin> References: <1452530987-994-1-git-send-email-petter@technux.se> <1452530987-994-5-git-send-email-petter@technux.se> <7564A308-E4D5-4B05-B03A-95A2B37A5F59@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7564A308-E4D5-4B05-B03A-95A2B37A5F59@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 4/5] pitft: Add basic support for PiTFT X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:32:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:55:43AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Jan 11, 2016, at 8:49 AM, Petter Mabäcker wrote: > > > > Add basic support for PiTFT display by using device-trees. > > > > In order get it working below configurations must be active in > > local.conf: > > > > MACHINEOVERRIDES .= ":pitft” > > Using MACHINE_FEATURES will be more appropriate term. Effects are same. > Indeed. I support MACHINE_FEATURE usage here. -- Andrei Gherzan