From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] linux-fusion: fix several build issues
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:42:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160112174251.7280fdf3@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56951746.4070806@free.fr>
Hello,
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:09:58 +0100, Mason wrote:
> The first patch merely fixes a warning. The other two are required to
> use the module on Linux 4.x
>
> Signed-off-by: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
We need your real name here to accept your patches. See
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/SubmittingPatches#L448.
> diff --git a/package/linux-fusion/0002-Fix-mismatched-conversion-spec-and-value-in-printk.patch b/package/linux-fusion/0002-Fix-mismatched-conversion-spec-and-value-in-printk.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..18fd2395e0f7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/linux-fusion/0002-Fix-mismatched-conversion-spec-and-value-in-printk.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +From debb9cafe9b7cc2b286399ecc8e3210480061c70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
> +Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:42:16 +0100
> +Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Fix mismatched conversion spec and value in printk
Please generate the patches with 'git format-patch -N' so that we don't
have numbered patches.
> +
> +linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusiondev.c:775:38: warning:
> +format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 7 has type 'int'
> +
> +Subtracting two pointers yields a ptrdiff_t value, and ptrdiff_t is not
> +necessarily an alias for long int. Cast the value to long int.
We also need a SoB line inside the patches.
> +---
> + linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusiondev.c | 2 +-
> + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusiondev.c b/linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusiondev.c
> +index 7003407f7e1e..dfb5f8ecb81a 100644
> +--- a/linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusiondev.c
> ++++ b/linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusiondev.c
> +@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ call_ioctl(FusionDev * dev, Fusionee * fusionee,
> + printk( KERN_ERR "fusion: FUSION_CALL_EXECUTE3 with errorneous call (failed on previous ioctl call), "
> + "call id %d, flags 0x%08x, arg %d, length %u, serial %u, %ld\n",
> + execute3.call_id, execute3.flags, execute3.call_arg, execute3.length, execute3.ret_length,
> +- (execute3_bin - (FusionCallExecute3 *) arg) );
> ++ (long int)(execute3_bin - (FusionCallExecute3 *) arg) );
Can you try instead to replace '%ld' by '%tu'. Apparently, according to
lib/vsprintf.c, %t is the proper format specifier for ptrdiff_t.
It is for example used here:
mm/slub.c: pr_err("INFO: Object 0x%p @offset=%tu\n", p, p - addr);
Or maybe you need %td if the value can be negative.
> diff --git a/package/linux-fusion/0003-Fix-fusion-Unknown-symbol-tasklist_lock-err-0.patch b/package/linux-fusion/0003-Fix-fusion-Unknown-symbol-tasklist_lock-err-0.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..191e47d1d367
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/linux-fusion/0003-Fix-fusion-Unknown-symbol-tasklist_lock-err-0.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +From a6e950ea4827813c70fafa912c5c3d1f8a2ccaf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
> +Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:45:30 +0100
> +Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Fix fusion: Unknown symbol tasklist_lock (err 0)
> +
> +Commit 28f6569ab7d0 renamed TREE_PREEMPT_RCU to PREEMPT_RCU in 3.19
> +As a result, the code incorrectly falls back to using tasklist_lock
> +(which was made private in 2.6.18)
> +
> +Always use rcu_read_lock on modern kernels.
Missing SoB line.
> +---
> + linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusionee.c | 4 ++--
> + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusionee.c b/linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusionee.c
> +index ef067f5bc831..adaabaedb355 100644
> +--- a/linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusionee.c
> ++++ b/linux/drivers/char/fusion/fusionee.c
> +@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ fusionee_kill(FusionDev * dev,
> + if (f != fusionee && (!target || target == f->id)) {
> + struct task_struct *p;
> +
> +-#if defined(CONFIG_TREE_RCU) || defined(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU) || defined(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) || defined(rcu_read_lock)
> ++#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,18) || defined(rcu_read_lock)
Are you sure it is good to keep the defined(rcu_read_lock) test ? This
only works if rcu_read_lock is a macro, not if it's an inline function.
If tasklisk_lock is available up to 2.6.18, then why not simply keep
the version-based condition?
> diff --git a/package/linux-fusion/0004-Port-one-one_udp.c-to-Linux-4.1.patch b/package/linux-fusion/0004-Port-one-one_udp.c-to-Linux-4.1.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1e05808e9bc2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/linux-fusion/0004-Port-one-one_udp.c-to-Linux-4.1.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
> +From cd420f7ed42e4a580edbeb3bc49b8492f2c71b91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
> +Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:01:42 +0100
> +Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Port one/one_udp.c to Linux 4.1
> +
> +Kernel commit c0371da6047a replaced msg_iov and msg_iovlen with msg_iter
> +in struct msghdr since 3.19
> +
> +one/one_udp.c: In function 'ksocket_send_iov':
> +one/one_udp.c:186:9: error: 'struct msghdr' has no member named 'msg_iov'
> +one/one_udp.c:187:9: error: 'struct msghdr' has no member named 'msg_iovlen'
> +
> +one/one_udp.c: In function 'ksocket_receive':
> +one/one_udp.c:221:9: error: 'struct msghdr' has no member named 'msg_iov'
> +one/one_udp.c:222:9: error: 'struct msghdr' has no member named 'msg_iovlen'
> +
> +The iov_iter interface
> +https://lwn.net/Articles/625077/
> +
> +Kernel commit d8725c86aeba dropped the len parameter in sock_sendmsg
> +since 4.1
> +
> +one/one_udp.c: In function 'ksocket_send_iov':
> +one/one_udp.c:192:13: error: too many arguments to function 'sock_sendmsg'
Missing SoB.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-12 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-12 15:09 [Buildroot] [PATCH] linux-fusion: fix several build issues Mason
2016-01-12 16:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-01-12 22:20 ` Mason
2016-01-13 8:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-01-15 16:12 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] " Mason
2016-01-16 13:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160112174251.7280fdf3@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.