All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 1/2] blockdev: Error out on negative throttling option values
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:29:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113002948.GC25517@ad.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <w51twmider0.fsf@maestria.local.igalia.com>

On Tue, 01/12 16:00, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Mon 11 Jan 2016 06:42:38 AM CET, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > The implicit casting from unsigned int to double changes negative
> > values into large positive numbers, whereas explicitly casting to
> > signed integer first will let us catch the invalid value and report
> > error correctly:
> >
> >     $ qemu-system-x86_64 -drive file=null-co://,iops=-1
> >     qemu-system-x86_64: -drive file=null-co://,iops=-1: bps/iops/maxs
> >     values must be 0 or greater
> >
> 
> >          throttle_cfg->buckets[THROTTLE_BPS_TOTAL].avg =
> > -            qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "throttling.bps-total", 0);
> > +            (int64_t)qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "throttling.bps-total", 0);
> 
> It seems to me that the problem is that qemu_opt_get_number() returns a
> value different from the one specified in the comand-line.
> 
> How do we even tell the difference between a negative number and its
> bit-to-bit positive equivalent?

We can't. :(

> 
> If we are going to reject very large numbers I would rather check that
> the throtting values are within a sane range and throw an error
> otherwise.

Yes, that is probably more accurate to the user.

Fam

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-13  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-11  5:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] block: Reject negative values for throttling options Fam Zheng
2016-01-11  5:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] blockdev: Error out on negative throttling option values Fam Zheng
2016-01-12 15:00   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Alberto Garcia
2016-01-13  0:29     ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2016-01-11  5:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] iotests: Test that negative throttle values are rejected Fam Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160113002948.GC25517@ad.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.