From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf record: missing buildid for callstack modules
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:25:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113102501.GB9644@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160112153723.GK6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:34:54AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> > Have you ever played, when you noticed those overheads, with -N? Or just used
> > the -B big hammer and moved on?
>
> I yelled on irc, jolsa told me to use -B, I moved on ;-)
So I think we should grow mtime protection, to not display incorrect data - and
then that should become the default. (in addition to per CPU recording threads.)
Way too slow recording is something I experience as well - and to have a slow
_performance_ profiling tool is pretty ironic! ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-07 21:56 [RFC] perf record: missing buildid for callstack modules Stephane Eranian
2016-01-07 21:57 ` Andi Kleen
2016-01-07 22:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-01-07 21:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-07 22:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-01-07 22:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-01-07 23:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-08 18:01 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-01-08 18:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-11 17:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 18:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-11 20:06 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-01-12 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-12 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-12 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 14:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-12 15:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 15:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-12 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 16:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 17:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-13 10:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-13 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-14 11:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-14 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 1:59 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-01-15 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 18:58 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-01-15 19:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-15 21:49 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-01-15 21:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 21:02 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-01-12 13:08 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-01-12 14:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-12 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-13 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-01-12 14:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-13 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-13 15:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-19 14:56 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-01-19 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-19 15:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-09 10:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-01-11 9:27 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-01-11 11:02 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-01-11 11:54 ` Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160113102501.GB9644@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.