From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E62E73180 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.nefkom.net (unknown [192.168.8.184]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3pgZ4Y2CY7z3hjJ6; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:30:05 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: Fe5Do2mF0XJBOYrhnsiDL6cvzNEtmzaXMwYYfta9Hfo= Received: from chi.localnet (unknown [195.140.253.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-auth.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3pgZ4X6zTJzvdWS; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:30:04 +0100 (CET) From: Marek Vasut To: Otavio Salvador Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:30:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.14-2-amd64; KDE/4.13.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <1452656212-9836-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201601131653.11865.marex@denx.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201601131730.04848.marex@denx.de> Cc: Otavio Salvador , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] u-boot: Update to 2016.01 release X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:30:08 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 04:55:56 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 04:39:53 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 01:04:31 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> >> > Upgrade U-Boot to latest version and drop upstreamed patches. > >> >> > > >> >> > Repair configuration of U-Boot during build. It is no longer > >> >> > possible to run "make foomachine" in U-Boot. Instead, it is > >> >> > necessary to do "make foomachine_defconfig ; make". Fix this > >> >> > in u-boot.inc and u-boot-fw-utils*.bb . > >> >> > >> >> Please drop this config suffix, from u-boot.inc. The config value > >> >> should be used as is and the respective BSP ought to be fixed to > >> >> change _config to _defconfig. > >> > > >> > If I don't have the _defconfig there AND I define UBOOT_MACHINE in my > >> > machine file, it will call "make machine", which no longer works. > >> > >> I know and the right fix is to use the right value to UBOOT_MACHINE as > >> we do for KERNEL_DEVICETREE. > > > > So what is the right value ? UBOOT_MACHINE := "foo_defconfig" ? This does > > not sound right at all. > > > > And what is the right value of UBOOT_CONFIG then ? > > foo_defconfig. > > This is what we pass for make to configure the board and should be the > given value. OK, that makes sense. You didn't answer my question about UBOOT_MACHINE though. Any thoughts on that ? > As we does for device tree, where we pass for KERNEL_DEVICETREE: > > foo-bar.dtb > > and this is also given for the make, for the kernel. This is fine. Best regards, Marek Vasut