From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CE7731BE for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.nefkom.net (unknown [192.168.8.184]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3pgZyP6ML5z3hjZK; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:09:49 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: 6J4dl+fdpXXv7VDWcMUwk0fg3yaNS0QD2tn3or0LHp4= Received: from chi.localnet (unknown [195.140.253.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-auth.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3pgZyP4fn3zvdWS; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:09:49 +0100 (CET) From: Marek Vasut To: Otavio Salvador Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:09:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.14-2-amd64; KDE/4.13.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <1452656212-9836-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201601131730.04848.marex@denx.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201601131809.49390.marex@denx.de> Cc: Otavio Salvador , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] u-boot: Update to 2016.01 release X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:09:51 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 05:40:20 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 04:55:56 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 04:39:53 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> >> > On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 01:04:31 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> >> >> > Upgrade U-Boot to latest version and drop upstreamed patches. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Repair configuration of U-Boot during build. It is no longer > >> >> >> > possible to run "make foomachine" in U-Boot. Instead, it is > >> >> >> > necessary to do "make foomachine_defconfig ; make". Fix this > >> >> >> > in u-boot.inc and u-boot-fw-utils*.bb . > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Please drop this config suffix, from u-boot.inc. The config value > >> >> >> should be used as is and the respective BSP ought to be fixed to > >> >> >> change _config to _defconfig. > >> >> > > >> >> > If I don't have the _defconfig there AND I define UBOOT_MACHINE in > >> >> > my machine file, it will call "make machine", which no longer > >> >> > works. > >> >> > >> >> I know and the right fix is to use the right value to UBOOT_MACHINE > >> >> as we do for KERNEL_DEVICETREE. > >> > > >> > So what is the right value ? UBOOT_MACHINE := "foo_defconfig" ? This > >> > does not sound right at all. > >> > > >> > And what is the right value of UBOOT_CONFIG then ? > >> > >> foo_defconfig. > >> > >> This is what we pass for make to configure the board and should be the > >> given value. > > > > OK, that makes sense. You didn't answer my question about UBOOT_MACHINE > > though. Any thoughts on that ? > > If using UBOOT_MACHINE = "foo_defconfig" will work just fine. This makes no sense at all, does it ? How can UBOOT_MACHINE contain _defconfig ? This sounds like a crude hack, not a systematic solution. Best regards, Marek Vasut