From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
aniroop.mathur@gmail.com, s.samuel@samsung.com,
r.mahale@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v5]Input: evdev: fix bug of dropping full valid packet after syn_dropped
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:52:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113185239.GC39593@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452686262-6684-1-git-send-email-a.mathur@samsung.com>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:27:41PM +0530, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
> If last event in old queue that was dropped was EV_SYN/SYN_REPORT, then
> lets generate EV_SYN/SYN_REPORT immediately after queing EV_SYN/SYN_DROPPED
> so that clients would not ignore next valid full packet events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/evdev.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/evdev.c b/drivers/input/evdev.c
> index e9ae3d5..0bc7b98 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/evdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/evdev.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,12 @@ static void __evdev_flush_queue(struct evdev_client *client, unsigned int type)
> static void __evdev_queue_syn_dropped(struct evdev_client *client)
> {
> struct input_event ev;
> + struct input_event *prev_ev;
> ktime_t time;
> + unsigned int mask = client->bufsize - 1;
> +
> + /* store previous event */
> + prev_ev = &client->buffer[(client->head - 1) & mask];
How do you know that previous event is valid/exists? In fact, when we
are dropping events due to the full queue, you will be referencing the
newest event being processed, not the previous event.
I also wonder if this code is safe with regard to __evdev_flush_queue()
that is dropping bunch of events and possible empty SYN_REPORT groups.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 11:57 [PATCH] [v5]Input: evdev: fix bug of dropping full valid packet after syn_dropped Aniroop Mathur
2016-01-13 18:52 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2016-01-13 20:28 ` Aniroop Mathur
2016-01-14 17:52 ` Aniroop Mathur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160113185239.GC39593@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=a.mathur@samsung.com \
--cc=aniroop.mathur@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r.mahale@samsung.com \
--cc=s.samuel@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.