All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: hide __efistub_ aliases from kallsyms
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:41:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160115124159.GF3262@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452860937-4413-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Commit e8f3010f7326 ("arm64/efi: isolate EFI stub from the kernel
> proper") isolated the EFI stub code from the kernel proper by prefixing
> all of its symbols with __efistub_, and selectively allowing access to
> core kernel symbols from the stub by emitting __efistub_ aliases for
> functions and variables that the stub can access legally.
> 
> As an unintended side effect, these aliases are emitted into the
> kallsyms symbol table, which means they may turn up in backtraces,
> e.g.,
> 
>   ...
>   PC is at __efistub_memset+0x108/0x200
>   LR is at fixup_init+0x3c/0x48
>   ...
>   [<ffffff8008328608>] __efistub_memset+0x108/0x200
>   [<ffffff8008094dcc>] free_initmem+0x2c/0x40
>   [<ffffff8008645198>] kernel_init+0x20/0xe0
>   [<ffffff8008085cd0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
> 
> The backtrace in question has nothing to do with the EFI stub, but
> simply returns one of the several aliases of memset() that have been
> recorded in the kallsyms table. This is undesirable, since it may
> suggest to people who are not aware of this that the issue they are
> seeing is somehow EFI related.
> 
> So hide the __efistub_ aliases from kallsyms, by emitting them as
> absolute linker symbols explicitly. The distinction between those
> and section relative symbols is completely irrelevant to these
> definitions, and to the final link we are performing when these
> definitions are being taken into account (the distinction is only
> relevant to symbols defined inside a section definition when performing
> a partial link), and so the resulting values are identical to the
> original ones. Since absolute symbols are ignored by kallsyms, this
> will result in these values to be omitted from its symbol table.
> 
> After this patch, the backtrace generated from the same address looks
> like this:
>   ...
>   PC is at __memset+0x108/0x200
>   LR is at fixup_init+0x3c/0x48
>   ...
>   [<ffffff8008328608>] __memset+0x108/0x200
>   [<ffffff8008094dcc>] free_initmem+0x2c/0x40
>   [<ffffff8008645198>] kernel_init+0x20/0xe0
>   [<ffffff8008085cd0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/image.h | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h
> index ddd61e2d9e3e..ce6f02c56b3d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,16 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
>  
>  /*
> + * Prevent the symbol aliases below from being emitted into the kallsyms
> + * table, by forcing them to be absolute symbols (which are conveniently
> + * ignored by scripts/kallsyms) rather than section relative symbols.
> + * The distinction is only relevant for partial linking, and only for symbols
> + * that are defined within a section declaration (which is not the case for
> + * the definitions below) so the resulting values will be identical.
> + */
> +#define KALLSYMS_HIDE(sym)	ABSOLUTE(sym)

>From looking at the GNU LD manual recently, I discovered
PROVIDE_HIDDEN(sym), which sounds closer to what we want semantically,
even if ABSOLUTE(sym) acheives the same thing.

If that works, that might be preferable.

Either way this looks sensible to me, so:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> +
> +/*
>   * The EFI stub has its own symbol namespace prefixed by __efistub_, to
>   * isolate it from the kernel proper. The following symbols are legally
>   * accessed by the stub, so provide some aliases to make them accessible.
> @@ -89,25 +99,25 @@
>   * linked at. The routines below are all implemented in assembler in a
>   * position independent manner
>   */
> -__efistub_memcmp		= __pi_memcmp;
> -__efistub_memchr		= __pi_memchr;
> -__efistub_memcpy		= __pi_memcpy;
> -__efistub_memmove		= __pi_memmove;
> -__efistub_memset		= __pi_memset;
> -__efistub_strlen		= __pi_strlen;
> -__efistub_strcmp		= __pi_strcmp;
> -__efistub_strncmp		= __pi_strncmp;
> -__efistub___flush_dcache_area	= __pi___flush_dcache_area;
> +__efistub_memcmp		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_memcmp);
> +__efistub_memchr		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_memchr);
> +__efistub_memcpy		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_memcpy);
> +__efistub_memmove		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_memmove);
> +__efistub_memset		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_memset);
> +__efistub_strlen		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_strlen);
> +__efistub_strcmp		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_strcmp);
> +__efistub_strncmp		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_strncmp);
> +__efistub___flush_dcache_area	= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi___flush_dcache_area);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> -__efistub___memcpy		= __pi_memcpy;
> -__efistub___memmove		= __pi_memmove;
> -__efistub___memset		= __pi_memset;
> +__efistub___memcpy		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_memcpy);
> +__efistub___memmove		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_memmove);
> +__efistub___memset		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(__pi_memset);
>  #endif
>  
> -__efistub__text			= _text;
> -__efistub__end			= _end;
> -__efistub__edata		= _edata;
> +__efistub__text			= KALLSYMS_HIDE(_text);
> +__efistub__end			= KALLSYMS_HIDE(_end);
> +__efistub__edata		= KALLSYMS_HIDE(_edata);
>  
>  #endif
>  
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-15 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-15 12:28 [PATCH] arm64: hide __efistub_ aliases from kallsyms Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-15 12:41 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-01-15 12:46   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160115124159.GF3262@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.