All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] x86/mcheck/AMD: Fix LVT offset configuration for thresholding
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:37:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160116103742.GA31869@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452901836-27632-5-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 05:50:35PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> For processor families with  SMCA feature, the LVT offset
> for threshold interrupts is configured only in MSR 0xC0000410
> and not in each per bank MISC register as was done in earlier
> families.
> 
> Fixing the code here to obtain the LVT offset from the correct
> MSR for those families which have SMCA feature enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Did a small cleanup ontop:

---
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out threshold block preparation

mce_amd_feature_init() was getting pretty fat, carve out the
threshold_block setup into a separate function on order to simplify
flow and make it more understandable.

No functionality change.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
index b9739b9b9341..57c7b296d1c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
@@ -267,14 +267,60 @@ static void deferred_error_interrupt_enable(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	wrmsr(MSR_CU_DEF_ERR, low, high);
 }
 
+static int
+prepare_threshold_block(unsigned int bank, unsigned int block, u32 addr,
+			int offset, u32 misc_high)
+{
+	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	struct threshold_block b;
+	int new;
+
+	if (!block)
+		per_cpu(bank_map, cpu) |= (1 << bank);
+
+	memset(&b, 0, sizeof(b));
+	b.cpu			= cpu;
+	b.bank			= bank;
+	b.block			= block;
+	b.address		= addr;
+	b.interrupt_capable	= lvt_interrupt_supported(bank, misc_high);
+
+	if (!b.interrupt_capable)
+		goto done;
+
+	b.interrupt_enable = 1;
+
+	if (mce_flags.smca) {
+		u32 smca_low = 0, smca_high = 0;
+
+		/* Gather LVT offset for thresholding */
+		if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_CU_DEF_ERR, &smca_low, &smca_high))
+			goto out;
+
+		new = (smca_low & SMCA_THR_LVT_OFF) >> 12;
+	} else {
+		new = (misc_high & MASK_LVTOFF_HI) >> 20;
+	}
+
+	offset = setup_APIC_mce_threshold(offset, new);
+
+	if ((offset == new) &&
+	    (mce_threshold_vector != amd_threshold_interrupt))
+		mce_threshold_vector = amd_threshold_interrupt;
+
+done:
+	mce_threshold_block_init(&b, offset);
+
+out:
+	return offset;
+}
+
 /* cpu init entry point, called from mce.c with preempt off */
 void mce_amd_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
-	struct threshold_block b;
-	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	u32 low = 0, high = 0, address = 0;
 	unsigned int bank, block;
-	int offset = -1, new;
+	int offset = -1;
 
 	for (bank = 0; bank < mca_cfg.banks; ++bank) {
 		for (block = 0; block < NR_BLOCKS; ++block) {
@@ -299,41 +345,7 @@ void mce_amd_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 			     (high & MASK_LOCKED_HI))
 				continue;
 
-			if (!block)
-				per_cpu(bank_map, cpu) |= (1 << bank);
-
-			memset(&b, 0, sizeof(b));
-			b.cpu			= cpu;
-			b.bank			= bank;
-			b.block			= block;
-			b.address		= address;
-			b.interrupt_capable	= lvt_interrupt_supported(bank, high);
-
-			if (!b.interrupt_capable)
-				goto init;
-
-			b.interrupt_enable = 1;
-
-			if (mce_flags.smca) {
-				u32 smca_low = 0, smca_high = 0;
-
-				/* Gather LVT offset for thresholding */
-				if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_CU_DEF_ERR, &smca_low, &smca_high))
-					break;
-
-				new = (smca_low & SMCA_THR_LVT_OFF) >> 12;
-			} else {
-				new = (high & MASK_LVTOFF_HI) >> 20;
-			}
-
-			offset  = setup_APIC_mce_threshold(offset, new);
-
-			if ((offset == new) &&
-			    (mce_threshold_vector != amd_threshold_interrupt))
-				mce_threshold_vector = amd_threshold_interrupt;
-
-init:
-			mce_threshold_block_init(&b, offset);
+			offset = prepare_threshold_block(bank, block, address, offset, high);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.3.5

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-16 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-15 23:50 [PATCH V2 0/5] Updates to AMD MCE driver per Scalable MCA spec Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-15 23:50 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] x86, mce: Fix order of AMD MCE init function call Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-15 23:50 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] x86/mcheck/AMD: Do not perform shared bank check for future processors Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-16  1:01   ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-16  1:01   ` [PATCH] x86/mcheck/AMD: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2016-01-15 23:50 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] x86/mcheck/AMD: Reduce number of blocks scanned per bank Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-15 23:50 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] x86/mcheck/AMD: Fix LVT offset configuration for thresholding Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-16 10:37   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-01-16 10:45   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-15 23:50 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] x86/mcheck/AMD: Set MCAX Enable bit Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-16 16:05 ` [PATCH V2 0/5] Updates to AMD MCE driver per Scalable MCA spec Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160116103742.GA31869@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.