From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Xavier Gnata <xavier.gnata@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Ashwini Pahuja <ashwini.linux@gmail.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Subject: Re: ID conflict between bdc_pci and "720p FaceTime HD Camera"
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:58:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160119225806.GA1841@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569BB4C2.3020602@gmail.com>
[+cc Ashwini, Felipe]
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 04:35:30PM +0100, Xavier Gnata wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The development of a driver for
> 02:00.0 Multimedia controller [0480]: Broadcom Corporation 720p
> FaceTime HD Camera [14e4:1570]
> has started. It is still in an early stage but it's progressing and
> it already streams.
> https://github.com/patjak/bcwc_pcie
>
> However, as you can see, this webcam shares the exact same ID as
> bdc_pci 0x1570 .
>
> Could we use e.g. PCI_CLASS in bdc_pci to avoid grabbing the webcam
> incorrectly?
> The FaceTime HD Camera has PCI_CLASS 0x048000
> I hope that bdc_pci has another PCI_CLASS.
> Or maybe there is a better way to distinguish bdc_pci from FaceTime
> HD Camera. What do you think?
This is what the PCI Vendor/Device IDs are for. It's a shame that
Broadcom apparently screwed up and used the same IDs in two different
devices.
At least, I *assume* they're different. I can't really tell what the
bdc_pci driver does, so it's conceivable that it's using the same
device in a different way than you are.
If they really are different devices, using the class code sounds like
a reasonable way to differentiate them.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-19 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-17 15:35 ID conflict between bdc_pci and "720p FaceTime HD Camera" Xavier Gnata
2016-01-19 22:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-01-19 23:50 ` Xavier Gnata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160119225806.GA1841@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ashwini.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xavier.gnata@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.