From: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Robert Richter" <rric@kernel.org>,
"Jacob Shin" <jacob.w.shin@gmail.com>,
"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"Fr�d�ric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spg_linux_kernel@amd.com,
x86@kernel.org, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Andreas Herrmann" <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>,
"Suravee Suthikulpanit" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"Aravind Gopalakrishnan" <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Fengguang Wu" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
"Aaron Lu" <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:48:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160120044823.GA13477@hr-amur2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160119121250.GA6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter,
Thanks so much to your comments.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:12:50PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:50:08AM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > +struct power_pmu {
> > + spinlock_t lock;
>
> This should be a raw_spinlock_t, as it'll be nested under other
> raw_spinlock_t's.
>
Do you mean the following spinlock operations are in hardware
interrupts disabled case, so I need use raw_spinlock_t instead, right?
Use raw_spin_lock_irqsave/raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore?
> > + struct list_head active_list;
> > + struct pmu *pmu; /* pointer to power_pmu_class */
> > + local64_t cpu_sw_pwr_ptsc;
> > +};
>
> > +static void pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct power_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(amd_power_pmu);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
>
> IRQs will be disabled here.
>
> > + __pmu_event_start(pmu, event);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pmu_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct power_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(amd_power_pmu);
> > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
>
> idem
>
> > +
> > + /* mark event as deactivated and stopped */
> > + if (!(hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)) {
> > + list_del(&event->active_entry);
> > + hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* check if update of sw counter is necessary */
> > + if ((mode & PERF_EF_UPDATE) && !(hwc->state & PERF_HES_UPTODATE)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Drain the remaining delta count out of a event
> > + * that we are disabling:
> > + */
> > + event_update(event, pmu);
> > + hwc->state |= PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pmu_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct power_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(amd_power_pmu);
> > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +
>
> idem
>
> > + hwc->state = PERF_HES_UPTODATE | PERF_HES_STOPPED;
> > +
> > + if (mode & PERF_EF_START)
> > + __pmu_event_start(pmu, event);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
>
> > +static int power_cpu_init(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + int i, cu, ret = 0;
> > + cpumask_var_t mask, dummy_mask;
> > +
> > + cu = cpu / cores_per_cu;
> > +
> > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&dummy_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < cores_per_cu; i++)
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(i, mask);
> > +
> > + cpumask_shift_left(mask, mask, cu * cores_per_cu);
> > +
> > + if (!cpumask_and(dummy_mask, mask, &cpu_mask))
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_mask);
> > +
> > + free_cpumask_var(dummy_mask);
> > +out:
> > + free_cpumask_var(mask);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> > +static int power_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
> > + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int cpu = (long)hcpu;
> > +
> > + switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
> > + case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> > + if (power_cpu_prepare(cpu))
> > + return NOTIFY_BAD;
> > + break;
> > + case CPU_STARTING:
> > + if (power_cpu_init(cpu))
> > + return NOTIFY_BAD;
>
> this is called with IRQs disabled, which makes those GFP_KERNEL allocs
> above a pretty bad idea.
>
Right, so should I use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate cpumask here?
> Also, note that -rt cannot actually do _any_ allocations/frees from
> STARTING.
>
> Please move the allocs/frees to PREPARE/ONLINE.
>
How about add two cpumask_var_t at power_pmu structure? Then allocate
the two cpumask_var_t (pmu->mask, pmu->dummy_mask), and they can be
also used on power_cpu_init.
Thanks,
Rui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-20 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-14 2:50 [PATCH v2 0/5] perf/x86/power: Introduce AMD accumlated power reporting mechanism Huang Rui
2016-01-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/amd: move nodes_per_socket into bsp_init_amd Huang Rui
2016-03-21 9:54 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/amd: Move nodes_per_socket into bsp_init_amd() tip-bot for Huang Rui
2016-01-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/amd: add accessor for number of cores per compute unit Huang Rui
2016-01-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/cpufeature: add AMD Accumulated Power Mechanism feature flag Huang Rui
2016-03-21 9:55 ` [tip:perf/urgent] x86/cpufeature, perf/x86: Add " tip-bot for Huang Rui
2016-01-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] perf/x86: Move events_sysfs_show outside CPU_SUP_INTEL Huang Rui
2016-01-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism Huang Rui
2016-01-19 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 4:48 ` Huang Rui [this message]
2016-01-20 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 7:04 ` Huang Rui
2016-01-21 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 14:42 ` Huang Rui
2016-01-21 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 15:24 ` Huang Rui
2016-01-21 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-22 8:04 ` Huang Rui
2016-01-22 17:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-14 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] perf/x86/power: Introduce AMD accumlated " Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160120044823.GA13477@hr-amur2 \
--to=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
--cc=jacob.w.shin@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=spg_linux_kernel@amd.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.