From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.free-electrons.com (down.free-electrons.com. [37.187.137.238]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 16si721859wmf.2.2016.01.20.16.30.47 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:30:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:30:47 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Laxman Dewangan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Message-ID: <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> References: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In-Reply-To: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Reply-To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Hi, On 20/01/2016 at 14:14:40 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : > One thing that I'm not sure is how to handle bisectability, in patch #5 > there will be two drivers that matches "rtc-max77802". So I don't know > if I should use a different platform_device_id name and change in the > same patch that max77802 is removed or if this is not a big deal so the > patches could stay as is. > I'm fine with those patches as is. > I believe all patches should go through the RTC tree with proper acks or > wait until the RTC patches land to pick the defconfig changes. > I think Olof would prefer the last patches to go through arm-soc. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:30:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> References: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:47991 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751430AbcAUAat (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:30:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Laxman Dewangan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi, On 20/01/2016 at 14:14:40 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : > One thing that I'm not sure is how to handle bisectability, in patch #5 > there will be two drivers that matches "rtc-max77802". So I don't know > if I should use a different platform_device_id name and change in the > same patch that max77802 is removed or if this is not a big deal so the > patches could stay as is. > I'm fine with those patches as is. > I believe all patches should go through the RTC tree with proper acks or > wait until the RTC patches land to pick the defconfig changes. > I think Olof would prefer the last patches to go through arm-soc. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:30:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support In-Reply-To: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> References: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Message-ID: <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 20/01/2016 at 14:14:40 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : > One thing that I'm not sure is how to handle bisectability, in patch #5 > there will be two drivers that matches "rtc-max77802". So I don't know > if I should use a different platform_device_id name and change in the > same patch that max77802 is removed or if this is not a big deal so the > patches could stay as is. > I'm fine with those patches as is. > I believe all patches should go through the RTC tree with proper acks or > wait until the RTC patches land to pick the defconfig changes. > I think Olof would prefer the last patches to go through arm-soc. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com