From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: jkosina@suse.cz, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Hendrik Woltersdorf <hendrikw@arcor.de>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "xfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE for xfsaild kthread"
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:21:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160121102129.GD29520@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160120211944.GE20456@dastard>
[CCing Rafael - the thread starts here
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452661968-11482-1-git-send-email-david%40fromorbit.com]
On Thu 21-01-16 08:19:44, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:47:50AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 13-01-16 16:12:48, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 24ba16bb3d499c49974669cd8429c3e4138ab102 as it
> > > prevents machines from suspending. This regression occurs when the
> > > xfsaild is idle on entry to suspend, and so there s no activity to
> > > wake it from it's idle sleep and hence see that it is supposed to
> > > freeze. Hence the freezer times out waiting for it and suspend is
> > > cancelled.
> > >
> > > There is no obvious fix for this short of freezing the filesystem
> > > properly, so revert this change for now.
> >
> > We had a similar report opensuse bugzilla just recently. I believe the
> > proper fix should be the following:
> ....
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> > index aa67339b9537..d6c9c3e9e02b 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
> > @@ -520,14 +520,14 @@ xfsaild(
> > if (!xfs_ail_min(ailp) &&
> > ailp->xa_target == ailp->xa_target_prev) {
> > spin_unlock(&ailp->xa_lock);
> > - schedule();
> > + freezable_schedule();
>
> Oh, wonderful. A completely separate set of undocumented schedule
> functions defined inside the freezer header files that are needed
> just for freezable kthreads.
Yeah, I am not really happy about them either.
> Perhaps there should be some documentation somewhere on how to write
> suspend safe kthreads?
There is something in Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt but
freezable_schedule* is not mentioned there. Prhaps something like the
following would make it more clear?
diff --git a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
index 85894d83b352..4df53f0c05a6 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
@@ -56,8 +56,11 @@ calling try_to_freeze(). The main loop of a freezable kernel thread may look
If a freezable kernel thread fails to call try_to_freeze() after the freezer has
initiated a freezing operation, the freezing of tasks will fail and the entire
hibernation operation will be cancelled. For this reason, freezable kernel
-threads must call try_to_freeze() somewhere or use one of the
-wait_event_freezable() and wait_event_freezable_timeout() macros.
+threads must call try_to_freeze() somewhere, use wait_event_freezable*()
+and wait_event_freezable_timeout() macros or use freezable_schedule* to hide
+the kernel thread from the suspend if it is guaranteed that a later wake up
+cannot interact with the suspend process (e.g. there is a try_to_freeze call
+or no IO is submitted or any of the suspended devices is not accessed etc..)
After the system memory state has been restored from a hibernation image and
devices have been reinitialized, the function thaw_processes() is called in
> This is too late for the current merge window, but I'll queue it up
> for the next one so we can get some testing on it first.
Sure, no problem and thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-21 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 5:12 [PATCH] Revert "xfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE for xfsaild kthread" Dave Chinner
2016-01-13 8:37 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-01-13 13:22 ` Brian Foster
2016-01-20 8:47 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-20 21:19 ` Dave Chinner
2016-01-21 10:21 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-01-21 22:24 ` Dave Chinner
2016-01-22 9:52 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160121102129.GD29520@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hendrikw@arcor.de \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.