From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:28:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator In-Reply-To: <20160121154649.GE3997@lukather> References: <1452605842-9317-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1452605842-9317-2-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20160112143100.GA14628@rob-hp-laptop> <20160115085734.GG4581@lukather> <20160117000434.GB7774@rob-hp-laptop> <20160118162538.GH6588@sirena.org.uk> <20160121154649.GE3997@lukather> Message-ID: <20160121162802.GL6588@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > I guess a separate driver would make it easier to deal with cases like > the one you suggested (shutting down when the load is going to be > lower). I don't see how we could have a good DT representation of that > if we're going to use lists. We can have a driver regardless of what the DT looks like, it's a question of how things get instantiated. > Anyway, I'm fine with both approaches, just let me know what you > prefer. Without seeing an implementation of the lists it's hard to say. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:28:02 +0000 Message-ID: <20160121162802.GL6588@sirena.org.uk> References: <1452605842-9317-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1452605842-9317-2-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20160112143100.GA14628@rob-hp-laptop> <20160115085734.GG4581@lukather> <20160117000434.GB7774@rob-hp-laptop> <20160118162538.GH6588@sirena.org.uk> <20160121154649.GE3997@lukather> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="boHZdxlSbghjKFo0" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160121154649.GE3997@lukather> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Rob Herring , Chen-Yu Tsai , Liam Girdwood , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --boHZdxlSbghjKFo0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > I guess a separate driver would make it easier to deal with cases like > the one you suggested (shutting down when the load is going to be > lower). I don't see how we could have a good DT representation of that > if we're going to use lists. We can have a driver regardless of what the DT looks like, it's a question of how things get instantiated. > Anyway, I'm fine with both approaches, just let me know what you > prefer. Without seeing an implementation of the lists it's hard to say. --boHZdxlSbghjKFo0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWoQcRAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ0WwH/ie8Jsrj02xCh+AvVoygbMRD Kbxl5hORPDiEGOtoWawhkV3jXKJEoDoB3/8dt8sxupSTcjGyf4aP9r1aSbHWUUyp 7YHD2Jm0B/nbgKwy542iH5gGmnfkwrqAaH8Fe5v3Yj6adkVFImfCrngFPeKEmnuY nYqsnbyydfT0y0M33f2t2RVMrQU+N3fAsuKD3Th3T8lIH/TAzVBxwpLm+pm5Y+fg n3/qSo4v1gs0tecORc71pQHKWQ/lptjHpsY0UXn9hRPDjOLLVEEBC/HQ+E3Sd3cJ R0Eg/PQx8EpfLwEc82tS1+NVrqKUtp5c09McB3kaLQEou6RXtKeg7v2tU9sW1Yw= =EAMn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --boHZdxlSbghjKFo0--