From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] locking/mutexes: don't spin on owner when wait list is not NULL.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:13:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160122031324.GI3818@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160122024854.GB23224@linux-uzut.site>
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:48:54PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >I did some testing, which exposed it to the 0day test robot, which
> >did note some performance differences. I was hoping that it would
> >clear up some instability from other patches, but no such luck. ;-)
>
> Oh, that explains why we got a performance regression report :)
Plus I suspected that you wanted some extra email. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-22 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-21 9:29 [PATCH RFC] locking/mutexes: don't spin on owner when wait list is not NULL Ding Tianhong
2016-01-21 21:23 ` Tim Chen
2016-01-22 2:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-01-22 2:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-01-22 3:13 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2016-01-21 23:02 ` Waiman Long
2016-01-22 6:09 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-01-22 13:38 ` Waiman Long
2016-01-22 16:46 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-01-25 2:23 ` [PATCH] locking/mutex: Allow next waiter lockless wakeup Davidlohr Bueso
2016-01-25 23:02 ` Waiman Long
2016-02-29 11:21 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2016-01-22 8:54 ` [PATCH RFC] locking/mutexes: don't spin on owner when wait list is not NULL Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-22 10:20 ` Jason Low
2016-01-22 10:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-22 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-22 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-22 13:59 ` Waiman Long
2016-01-24 8:03 ` Ding Tianhong
2016-01-29 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-30 1:18 ` Ding Tianhong
2016-02-01 3:29 ` huang ying
2016-02-01 3:35 ` Huang, Ying
2016-02-01 10:08 ` [PATCH] locking/mutex: Avoid spinner vs waiter starvation Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-02 21:19 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-03 7:10 ` Ding Tianhong
2016-02-03 19:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-04 1:20 ` Ding Tianhong
2016-02-12 18:33 ` Waiman Long
2016-02-03 22:07 ` Waiman Long
2016-02-04 1:35 ` Jason Low
2016-02-04 8:55 ` huang ying
2016-02-04 22:49 ` Jason Low
2016-01-22 13:41 ` [PATCH RFC] locking/mutexes: don't spin on owner when wait list is not NULL Waiman Long
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-21 6:53 [PATCH RFC ] " Ding Tianhong
2016-01-21 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-21 9:04 ` Ding Tianhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160122031324.GI3818@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.