From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aN6w2-0004vk-6N for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:45:34 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-x236.google.com with SMTP id yy13so60173052pab.3 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:45:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:45:09 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Hauke Mehrtens Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: bcm47xxpart: limit scanned flash area on BCM47XX (MIPS) only Message-ID: <20160123224509.GE24744@localhost> References: <1449277783-7369-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1449277783-7369-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 02:09:43AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > We allowed using bcm47xxpart on BCM5301X arch with commit: > 9e3afa5f5c7 ("mtd: bcm47xxpart: allow enabling on ARCH_BCM_5301X") > > BCM5301X devices may contain some partitions in higher memory, e.g. > Netgear R8000 has board_data at 0x2600000. To detect them we should > use size limit on MIPS only. Why was the siez limit imposed in the first place? Just to make the scan more efficient? > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki Pushed to l2-mtd.git/next