From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Adam C. Emerson" Subject: Re: About ceph_clock_now() Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:03:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20160125000337.GA19230@ultraspiritum.redhat.com> References: <1365711662.13730117.1453220271917.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20160119162902.GA21358@ultraspiritum.redhat.com> <1522288191.15295456.1453404176015.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1575597139.15885899.1453478438366.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <56A368C1.8000508@digiware.nl> <747915460.23855157.1453580447803.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20160123215543.GA8011@ultraspiritum.redhat.com> <56A4BB20.1040305@digiware.nl> <56A4C8D2.6020303@digiware.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36762 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751501AbcAYADj (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:03:39 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56A4C8D2.6020303@digiware.nl> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Willem Jan Withagen Cc: Matt Benjamin , Erwan Velu , Sage Weil , The Sacred Order of the Squid Cybernetic On 24/01/2016, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Not to irritate, but I just updated my copy of ceph:master and I could > not find any trace of a reference to CLOCK_MONOTONIC_FAST, so it has to > be in any of the WIPs ?? I had meant that there was an abstraction there, rather than that we had CLOCK_MONOTONIC_FAST already. But, does: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/7340 Work under your system/seem a sane way of doing it? -- Senior Software Engineer Red Hat Storage, Ann Arbor, MI, US IRC: Aemerson@{RedHat, OFTC, Freenode} 0x80F7544B90EDBFB9 E707 86BA 0C1B 62CC 152C 7C12 80F7 544B 90ED BFB9