From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Hall Subject: Re: [PKTGEN] additional terminal IO question Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:10:20 -0500 Message-ID: <20160125191020.GA21330@mhcomputing.net> References: <56A07267.2060001@mhcomputing.net> <04C50E6A-7E6F-410F-8D07-619766863227@intel.com> <0B797DEE-FCB2-4CE0-B3A3-86560BA3ADA5@intel.com> <20160123024826.GB25867@mhcomputing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: Andriy Berestovskyy Return-path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DD68D99 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 20:10:25 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:20:42AM +0100, Andriy Berestovskyy wrote: > Hi Matthew, > Every software has bugs. pktgen is a great tool and we appreciate it as is. > > I would prefer we discuss a patch rather that questioning a > functionality implemented way ago... > > Andriy Sure patches are the best. But in order to patch it you have to understand it first. So I'm providing feedback how we could make it easier to understand, so more people can run it, and learn it, and make patches. I'm hoping to make some patches myself in the next few months. I admit I am kind of slow because I only work on DPDK in my spare time right now. Matthew.