From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Robert Richter" <rric@kernel.org>,
"Jacob Shin" <jacob.w.shin@gmail.com>,
"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spg_linux_kernel@amd.com,
x86@kernel.org, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Andreas Herrmann" <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>,
"Suravee Suthikulpanit" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"Aravind Gopalakrishnan" <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Fengguang Wu" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
"Aaron Lu" <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:28:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160126082823.GA8729@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453710723-1616-1-git-send-email-ray.huang@amd.com>
* Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> wrote:
> +/*
> + * Acc power status counters
> + */
> +#define AMD_POWER_PKG_ID 0
> +#define AMD_POWER_EVENTSEL_PKG 1
> +/*
> + * the ratio of compute unit power accumulator sample period to the
> + * PTSC period
> + */
> +/*
> + * Accumulated power is to measure the sum of each compute unit's
> + * power consumption. So it picks only one core from each compute unit
> + * to get the power with MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR. The cpu_mask
> + * represents CPU bit map of all cores which are picked to measure the
> + * power for the compute units that they belong to.
> + */
> +static cpumask_t cpu_mask;
> + /*
> + * calculate the power comsumption for each compute unit over
> + * a time period, the unit of final value (delta) is
> + * micro-Watts. Then add it into event count.
> + */
Please capitalize sentences consistently - half of the comments you added start
lower-case.
> +static void __pmu_event_start(struct power_pmu *pmu,
> + struct perf_event *event)
So this looks better either on a single line, or as:
static void
__pmu_event_start(struct power_pmu *pmu, struct perf_event *event)
Breaking the argument list combines the worst of the two worlds.
> + if ((mode & PERF_EF_UPDATE) && !(hwc->state & PERF_HES_UPTODATE)) {
> + /*
> + * Drain the remaining delta count out of a event
> + * that we are disabling:
s/an event
(Please re-read all the comments - I saw a few other typos and spelling mistakes
as well.)
> + if (cfg == AMD_POWER_EVENTSEL_PKG)
> + bit = AMD_POWER_PKG_ID;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + event->hw.event_base = MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR;
> + event->hw.config = cfg;
> + event->hw.idx = bit;
> +
> + return ret;
so this control flow looks pretty weird. Why not:
> + if (cfg != AMD_POWER_EVENTSEL_PKG)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + event->hw.event_base = MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR;
> + event->hw.config = cfg;
> + event->hw.idx = AMD_POWER_PKG_ID;
> +
> + return ret;
?
> +static struct attribute_group pmu_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = pmu_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * at current, it only supports to report the power of each
s/currently it only supports power reporting of each
> + * processor/package
> + */
> +EVENT_ATTR_STR(power-pkg, power_pkg, "event=0x01");
> +
> +EVENT_ATTR_STR(power-pkg.unit, power_pkg_unit, "mWatts");
> +
> +/* convert the count from micro-Watts to milli-Watts */
> +EVENT_ATTR_STR(power-pkg.scale, power_pkg_scale, "1.000000e-3");
> +
> +
> +static struct attribute *events_attr[] = {
> + EVENT_PTR(power_pkg),
> + EVENT_PTR(power_pkg_unit),
> + EVENT_PTR(power_pkg_scale),
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group pmu_events_group = {
> + .name = "events",
> + .attrs = events_attr,
> +static struct attribute_group pmu_format_group = {
> + .name = "format",
> + .attrs = formats_attr,
> +};
Please initialize structures in a vertically aligned manner, like you did it later
on:
> +static struct pmu pmu_class = {
> + .attr_groups = attr_groups,
> + .task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context, /* system-wide only */
> + .event_init = pmu_event_init,
> + .add = pmu_event_add, /* must have */
> + .del = pmu_event_del, /* must have */
> + .start = pmu_event_start,
> + .stop = pmu_event_stop,
> + .read = pmu_event_read,
> +};
Btw., I don't think the 'must have' comment adds any important information needed
to understand this new PMU driver.
> +static int power_cpu_init(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct power_pmu *pmu = per_cpu(amd_power_pmu, cpu);
> +
> + if (pmu)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!cpumask_and(pmu->mask, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu),
> + &cpu_mask))
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_mask);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Hm, has this function ever been runtime tested? This function either does nothing
(contrary to the clear intention of twiddling the cpu_mask), or crashes on a NULL
pointer.
( Also, the code has an annoying line-break. Don't pacify checkpatch by making the
code harder to read. )
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-26 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 8:32 [PATCH v3] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism Huang Rui
2016-01-25 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-25 15:43 ` Huang Rui
2016-01-26 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-01-26 13:47 ` Huang Rui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160126082823.GA8729@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
--cc=jacob.w.shin@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=spg_linux_kernel@amd.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.