diff for duplicates of <20160127190849.GF25545@arm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 73a2c96..9fe9679 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:06:48PM +0000, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote: -> On 1/26/16, 3:54 AM, "Will Deacon" <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote: +> On 1/26/16, 3:54 AM, "Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote: > >The problem is that you have shared state between multiple SMMU instances, > >which I don't think is correct. I'm fine with a workaround, but I don't > >want this logic to be used on other implementations where it is not diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 4debb01..03fc8e7 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -4,18 +4,14 @@ "ref\06F24A28A-6302-4C48-A933-B47A9735808C@caviumnetworks.com\0" "ref\020160126115435.GB21553@arm.com\0" "ref\0E0484253-BE37-476A-9F4A-ABE6B74EC174@caviumnetworks.com\0" - "ref\0E0484253-BE37-476A-9F4A-ABE6B74EC174-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: iommu/arm-smmu-v2 ASID/VMID calculation\0" + "From\0will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)\0" + "Subject\0iommu/arm-smmu-v2 ASID/VMID calculation\0" "Date\0Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:08:50 +0000\0" - "To\0Chalamarla" - " Tirumalesh <Tirumalesh.Chalamarla-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org <iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>" - " linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:06:48PM +0000, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:\n" - "> On 1/26/16, 3:54 AM, \"Will Deacon\" <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" + "> On 1/26/16, 3:54 AM, \"Will Deacon\" <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:\n" "> >The problem is that you have shared state between multiple SMMU instances,\n" "> >which I don't think is correct. I'm fine with a workaround, but I don't\n" "> >want this logic to be used on other implementations where it is not\n" @@ -27,4 +23,4 @@ "\n" Will -facedcbbe88c116c8ad57a7b2303ab059e10e0ca1c50eaca1fc55e9d954afd71 +7c4f8349c62f3df397b2e67d0592781b9ec36e035094f6c30d05173cd85c39b2
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.