All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	stefanha@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 1/2] blockjob: Rename block_job_defer_to_main_loop
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:14:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160128131416.GA13357@ad.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160128115355.GG7206@stefanha-x1.localdomain>

On Thu, 01/28 11:53, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 03:02:50PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/block/blockjob.h b/include/block/blockjob.h
> > index d84ccd8..de59fc2 100644
> > --- a/include/block/blockjob.h
> > +++ b/include/block/blockjob.h
> > @@ -393,18 +393,20 @@ BlockErrorAction block_job_error_action(BlockJob *job, BlockDriverState *bs,
> >  typedef void BlockJobDeferToMainLoopFn(BlockJob *job, void *opaque);
> >  
> >  /**
> > - * block_job_defer_to_main_loop:
> > + * block_job_coroutine_complete:
> >   * @job: The job
> >   * @fn: The function to run in the main loop
> >   * @opaque: The opaque value that is passed to @fn
> >   *
> > - * Execute a given function in the main loop with the BlockDriverState
> > - * AioContext acquired.  Block jobs must call bdrv_unref(), bdrv_close(), and
> > - * anything that uses bdrv_drain_all() in the main loop.
> > + * Complete the block job coroutine and execute a given function in the main
> 
> This function does not "complete the block job coroutine" so this seems
> confusing to me.  How about "Call this function to schedule clean up
> code to run in the main loop when completing a block job"?

Sounds good.

> 
> That said, I'm not sure if changing the scope of this function is
> necessary at all.  If the next patch adds a job->aio_context pointer
> then it could set the pointer back after calling the user's function
> from the main loop.  Then this function could also be used in cases
> where the job/coroutine stays alive.

Yes, that can be done.

Fam

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-28 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-28  7:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] blockjob: Fix dead loop with block_job_finish_sync on dataplane disks Fam Zheng
2016-01-28  7:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] blockjob: Rename block_job_defer_to_main_loop Fam Zheng
2016-01-28 11:53   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-01-28 13:14     ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2016-01-28  7:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] blockjob: Fix hang in block_job_finish_sync Fam Zheng
2016-01-28  9:10   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-28 10:57     ` Fam Zheng
2016-01-28 12:07     ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160128131416.GA13357@ad.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.