From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: allow vmalloc regions to be set with set_memory_*
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:10:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160128181058.GQ775@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-GxicSKDq+Nm9H+dWrSVOhupozu4pZ=Pk7CzC_VrW=2Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 28 January 2016 at 16:08, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:01:05PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> The range of set_memory_* is currently restricted to the module address
> >> range because of difficulties in breaking down larger block sizes.
> >> vmalloc maps PAGE_SIZE pages so it is safe to use as well. Update the
> >> function ranges and add a comment explaining why the range is restricted
> >> the way it is.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > What's the user for this? It would be better to apply along with something
> > that actually needs to change permission for arbitrary vmalloc mappings.
> >
>
> BPF already uses set_memory_ro() but doesn't bother to check the return value.
Urgh :(
Then I can take it as a fix, if you like.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-18 14:01 [PATCH] arm64: allow vmalloc regions to be set with set_memory_* Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-18 15:05 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-28 15:08 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-28 16:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-28 16:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-28 18:10 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-01-28 19:07 ` Ard Biesheuvel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-12 21:46 [PATCH] arm64: Allow " Laura Abbott
2016-01-12 21:46 ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-13 0:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-13 0:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-13 0:31 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-13 0:31 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-13 14:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-13 14:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-13 16:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-13 16:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-14 23:01 ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-14 23:01 ` Laura Abbott
2016-01-18 11:56 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-18 11:56 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-28 1:47 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-28 1:47 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-28 10:51 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-28 10:51 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-28 11:47 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-28 11:47 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-28 14:27 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-28 14:27 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-29 1:21 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-29 1:21 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-29 11:02 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-29 11:02 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-30 2:48 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-01-30 2:48 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-02-03 13:43 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-03 13:43 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160128181058.GQ775@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.