From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] virtio: Introduce config
	RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:42:57 +0800
Message-ID: <20160129044257.GN4257@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1453203972-24855-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <1453203972-24855-2-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>
 <CAAyOgsarNWc1UH7uEo77cBnEuFosXxTBUtiqqTk5+AoR6iE72A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160127023356.GA4257@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <CAAyOgsZapsyxiTH2OiefsgbO__GBCPP-sviAf1aw-bkM6qai0A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2675957
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 05:42:12 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAyOgsZapsyxiTH2OiefsgbO__GBCPP-sviAf1aw-bkM6qai0A@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:02:26AM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> Hi Yuan,

It's Yuanhan, but not Yuan :)

> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Yuanhan Liu
> <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:53:21AM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> >> Ping?
> >
> > I was on vacation late last week. And I was quite busy till now after
> > the vacation. So, sorry that I still don't have time to do more detailed
> > reviews in 1 or 2 days. Hopefully I can make it by this Friday.
> >
> > BTW, I had a very glimpse of this patchset, overall, it looks much
> > better now, except the EAL changes (I'm not the maintainer) and the
> > virtio io port read/write stuff: Tetsuay suggested to add another
> > access wraps, but I have few concerns about that. Anyway, I don't
> > have time for deeper thoughts, and I will re-think it later.
> >
> >         --yliu
> 
> did you got the chance for reviewing virtio specific patches? Thanks.

Sorry for the long delay, it's very likely I will check your patches
this noon.

	--yliu