All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>,
	"open list:nvme" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	Vladislav Vovchenko <vladislav.vovchenko@sk.com>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nvme: generate OpenFirmware device path in the "bootorder" fw_cfg file
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:07:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160129190748.GE3863@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453850483-27511-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com>

Thanks, sounds and looks good.

Acked-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>

> Background on QEMU boot indices
> -------------------------------
> 
> Normally, the "bootindex" property is configured for bootable devices
> with:
> 
>   DEVICE_instance_init()
>     device_add_bootindex_property(..., "bootindex", ...)
>       object_property_add(..., device_get_bootindex,
>                           device_set_bootindex, ...)
> 
> and when the bootindex is set on the QEMU command line, with
> 
>   -device DEVICE,...,bootindex=N
> 
> the setter that was configured above is invoked:
> 
>   device_set_bootindex()
>     /* parse boot index */
>     visit_type_int32()
> 
>     /* verify unicity */
>     check_boot_index()
> 
>     /* store parsed boot index */
>     ...
> 
>     /* insert device path to boot order */
>     add_boot_device_path()
> 
> In the last step, add_boot_device_path() ensures that an OpenFirmware
> device path will show up in the "bootorder" fw_cfg file, at a position
> corresponding to the device's boot index. Thus guest firmware (SeaBIOS and
> OVMF) can try to boot off the device with the right priority.
> 
> NVMe boot index
> ---------------
> 
> In QEMU commit 33739c712982,
> 
>   nvma: ide: add bootindex to qom property
> 
> the following generic setters / getters:
> - device_set_bootindex()
> - device_get_bootindex()
> 
> were open-coded for NVMe, under the names
> - nvme_set_bootindex()
> - nvme_get_bootindex()
> 
> Plus nvme_instance_init() was added to configure the "bootindex" property
> manually, designating the open-coded getter & setter, rather than calling
> device_add_bootindex_property().
> 
> Crucially, nvme_set_bootindex() avoided the final add_boot_device_path()
> call. This fact is spelled out in the message of commit 33739c712982, and
> it was presumably the entire reason for all of the code duplication.
> 
> Now, Vladislav filed an RFE for OVMF
> <https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/issues/48>; OVMF should boot off NVMe
> devices. It is simple to build edk2's existent NvmExpressDxe driver into
> OVMF, but the boot order matching logic in OVMF can only handle NVMe if
> the "bootorder" fw_cfg file includes such devices.
> 
> Therefore this patch converts the NVMe device model to
> device_set_bootindex() all the way.
> 
> Device paths
> ------------
> 
> device_set_bootindex() accepts an optional parameter called "suffix". When
> present, it is expected to take the form of an OpenFirmware device path
> node, and it gets appended as last node to the otherwise auto-generated
> OFW path.
> 
> For NVMe, the auto-generated part is
> 
>   /pci@i0cf8/pci8086,5845@6[,1]
>        ^     ^            ^  ^
>        |     |            PCI slot and (present when nonzero)
>        |     |            function of the NVMe controller, both hex
>        |     "driver name" component, built from PCI vendor & device IDs
>        PCI root at system bus port, PIO
> 
> to which here we append the suffix
> 
>   /namespace@1,0
>              ^ ^
>              | big endian (MSB at lowest address) numeric interpretation
>              | of the 64-bit IEEE Extended Unique Identifier, aka EUI-64,
>              | hex
>              32-bit NVMe namespace identifier, aka NSID, hex
> 
> resulting in the OFW device path
> 
>   /pci@i0cf8/pci8086,5845@6[,1]/namespace@1,0
> 
> The reason for including the NSID and the EUI-64 is that an NVMe device
> can in theory produce several different namespaces (distinguished by
> NSID). Additionally, each of those may (optionally) have an EUI-64 value.
> 
> For now, QEMU only provides namespace 1.
> 
> Furthermore, QEMU doesn't even represent the EUI-64 as a standalone field;
> it is embedded (and left unused) inside the "NvmeIdNs.res30" array, at the
> last eight bytes. (Which is fine, since EUI-64 can be left zero-filled if
> unsupported by the device.)
> 
> Based on the above, we set the "unit address" part of the last
> ("namespace") node to fixed "1,0".
> 
> OVMF will then map the above OFW device path to the following UEFI device
> path fragment, for boot order processing:
> 
>   PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x6,0x1)/NVMe(0x1,00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00)
>           ^        ^   ^    ^    ^   ^
>           |        |   |    |    |   octets of the EUI-64 in address order
>           |        |   |    |    NSID
>           |        |   |    NVMe namespace messaging device path node
>           |        PCI slot and function
>           PCI root bridge
> 
> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> (supporter:nvme)
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> (supporter:Block layer core)
> Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org (open list:nvme)
> Cc: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
> Cc: Vladislav Vovchenko <vladislav.vovchenko@sk.com>
> Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-29 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-26 23:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nvme: generate OpenFirmware device path in the "bootorder" fw_cfg file Laszlo Ersek
2016-01-27  2:52 ` Gonglei (Arei)
2016-01-29 19:07 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-02-01  5:57 ` vladislav.vovchenko
2016-02-01  8:35   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-02-02 10:13     ` Gerd Hoffmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160129190748.GE3863@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=feng.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin@koconnor.net \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vladislav.vovchenko@sk.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.