From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.free-electrons.com (down.free-electrons.com. [37.187.137.238]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id s132si174014wmd.1.2016.01.31.03.29.26 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 03:29:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:29:26 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Joshua Clayton Cc: Alessandro Zummo , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] rtc: enable adjustment of clock offset Message-ID: <20160131112926.GH20165@piout.net> References: <3106681.dzRcYkv4oj@diplodocus> <20160126160031.GA25597@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In-Reply-To: <20160126160031.GA25597@piout.net> Reply-To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Hi, On 26/01/2016 at 17:00:31 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote : > On 26/01/2016 at 06:56:40 -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote : > > Ping? > > > > On Monday, January 04, 2016 10:31:18 AM Joshua Clayton wrote: > > > Alexandre, > > > this is the second version of apatch set to be able to adjust the > > > clock on a pcf2123, but with a big addition. I am also proposing > > > a couple of new rtc api functions and a new sysfs file. > > > > > > Patches 1-5 are very much v2 patches that address All of the > > > concerns you had with v1. It is my hope to get them merged without > > > too much more trouble. > > > > > The rtc _needs_ patches 1-5 in order to use the clock offset > > adjustment at all (current upstream code resets it to zero during > > device probe, so it doesn't survive a reboot) > > Should I split out patches 1-5 to make them easier to review? > > > > The merge widows just closed so I've started to collect a few patches > since monday. This is a big series and I didn't have time to review > everything yet. > Patches 1-5 are applied and pushed to rtc-next. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757364AbcAaL33 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jan 2016 06:29:29 -0500 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:43287 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757298AbcAaL32 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jan 2016 06:29:28 -0500 Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:29:26 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Joshua Clayton Cc: Alessandro Zummo , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] rtc: enable adjustment of clock offset Message-ID: <20160131112926.GH20165@piout.net> References: <3106681.dzRcYkv4oj@diplodocus> <20160126160031.GA25597@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160126160031.GA25597@piout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 26/01/2016 at 17:00:31 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote : > On 26/01/2016 at 06:56:40 -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote : > > Ping? > > > > On Monday, January 04, 2016 10:31:18 AM Joshua Clayton wrote: > > > Alexandre, > > > this is the second version of apatch set to be able to adjust the > > > clock on a pcf2123, but with a big addition. I am also proposing > > > a couple of new rtc api functions and a new sysfs file. > > > > > > Patches 1-5 are very much v2 patches that address All of the > > > concerns you had with v1. It is my hope to get them merged without > > > too much more trouble. > > > > > The rtc _needs_ patches 1-5 in order to use the clock offset > > adjustment at all (current upstream code resets it to zero during > > device probe, so it doesn't survive a reboot) > > Should I split out patches 1-5 to make them easier to review? > > > > The merge widows just closed so I've started to collect a few patches > since monday. This is a big series and I didn't have time to review > everything yet. > Patches 1-5 are applied and pushed to rtc-next. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com