All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akinobu.mita@gmail.com,
	jack@suse.cz, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com,
	peter@hurleysoftware.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] lib/spinlock_debug.c: prevent a recursive cycle in the debug code
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 21:40:08 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160131124007.GB1306@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160129125457.GI31266@X58A-UD3R>

On (01/29/16 21:54), Byungchul Park wrote:
> Hello, Andrew
> 
> Please take this v5 patch instead of v2 patch, which you took. Or give your
> opinion.
> 
> > It causes an infinite recursive cycle when using CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK,
> > in the spin_dump(). Backtrace prints printk() -> console_trylock() ->
> > do_raw_spin_lock() -> spin_dump() -> printk()... infinitely.
> > 
> > When the spin_dump() is called from printk(), we should prevent the
> > debug spinlock code from calling printk() again in that context. It's
> > reasonable to avoid printing "lockup suspected" which is just a warning
> > message but it would cause a real lockup definitely.


Hello Byungchul,

thanks for the patch and thanks for bringing this topic to discussion.
let's not rush, if you don't mind, and return back for a bit. there are
some serious cases (when we really would want to see a spin_dump output)
that are broken.

	-ss

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-31 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-29 12:43 [PATCH v5] lib/spinlock_debug.c: prevent a recursive cycle in the debug code Byungchul Park
2016-01-29 12:54 ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-31 12:40   ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2016-02-01  1:45     ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-01  2:13       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-30  9:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-02  2:34   ` Byungchul Park
2016-02-01  2:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-02-01  6:28   ` Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160131124007.GB1306@swordfish \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.