All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>,
	hpa@zytor.com, tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mcheck/therm_throt: Replace printk(KERN_XX...) with pr_xx(...)
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:38:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160201093809.GA6438@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160201082412.GA15735@gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:24:12AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > So there are 37,000+ printk() calls in the kernel and 900+ ones in arch/x86/ 
> > alone! Plus even after this patch there's 20 more printk()s left in 
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/...
> > 
> > We don't want to create a churn of 10,000+ commits to convert them to pr_*() 
> > facilities...
> > 
> > So we don't apply such 'conversion' patches unless it's done for a whole subsystem 
> > and done as part of a larger work with good reason, or if it's done as part of 
> > completely new facilities/drivers - and is done consistently.
> > 
> > Even then it's dubious to convert: people keep re-adding printk()s (which is a 
> > perfectly fine facility), which generates never ending churn ...

Amen to that!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-01  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1454312473-2685-1-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20160201081951.GA14977@gmail.com>
2016-02-01  8:24   ` [PATCH] mcheck/therm_throt: Replace printk(KERN_XX...) with pr_xx(...) Ingo Molnar
2016-02-01  9:38     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160201093809.GA6438@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.