From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM/ARM64 PCI_PROBE_ONLY platforms
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:19:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160201211936.GE4861@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160201162838.GB30869@red-moon>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:28:38PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:25:38PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 06:10:03PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >
> > > To do that, we must claim resources on PCI_PROBE_ONLY systems, but
> > > I know for certain Bjorn does not like the idea (I let you trawl
> > > the archives - at least he does not accept the idea of claiming
> > > resources ONLY on PCI_PROBE_ONLY systems, he thinks we should
> > > always claim resources regardless of that flag and fall-back to
> > > reassigning them in case claiming fails. That's perfectly reasonable,
> > > at least on systems with FW initializing PCI). The problem is dealing
> > > with legacy, so switching to resources claiming by default is a tad
> > > complicated, at least for testing (code is easy to implement).
> >
> > I'd like to think of PCI_PROBE_ONLY basically as "setting
> > IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED for every BAR", i.e., we can do everything we
> > normally do *except* write to the BAR (of course we have to write to
> > it to size the BAR during enumeration, but we have to restore the
> > original value).
>
> I am honestly a bit confused about the distinction between
> PCI_PROBE_ONLY and "IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED for every BAR", the more
> so if I read the resources assignment code, in particular:
>
> pci_assign_resource()
>
> in drivers/pci/setup-res.c
>
> That function assigns the resource but does not update the BAR
> if IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED is set. I wonder why the resource is
> assigned at all if IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED is set, probably to
> initialize its parent pointer and set it, still, the value in
> the struct resource may differ from what's in the BAR, I am not sure
> I understand why we are happy with that or I am reading code the
> wrong way (does not this give a view of resource tree disconnected
> from how HW is actually programmed ?)
I'm not happy with that -- it's just one of our many problems.
The assignment code doesn't doesn't really pay attention to
IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED. I don't think it pays attention to
PCI_PROBE_ONLY either, except that some arches don't even call the
assignment code if it is set.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-20 16:04 [RFC] ARM/ARM64 PCI_PROBE_ONLY platforms Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-20 16:13 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-01-20 18:10 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-20 18:15 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-01-29 23:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-22 16:28 ` Phil Edworthy
2016-01-25 17:51 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-28 17:27 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-29 12:02 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-01-29 6:32 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-01-29 23:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-02-01 16:28 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-01 21:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-01-29 23:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-30 0:14 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-01-30 13:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-30 17:51 ` Okaya
2016-02-01 15:25 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-01 21:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160201211936.GE4861@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.