From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com (comal.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.152]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2881D529C7 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u11MMwDm009647; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:22:58 -0600 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlemailx.itg.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u11MMw1J020691; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:22:58 -0600 Received: from dflp33.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.16) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:22:58 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u11MMvRW010538; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:22:58 -0600 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:22:42 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Ankur Tyagi Message-ID: <20160201222242.GW11314@edge> References: <20160201215854.GU11314@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org Subject: Re: What's the reason behind different config file in oe-layersetup X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:22:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I would recommend starting from arago-fido-config.txt and pin down all layers later, once your own development stabilizes and you are ready to make your release. You can also start with one of the latest coresdk or processor-sdk configs as well, but you maybe missing some of the important bugfixes from different layers that could be made during your development cycle... -- Denys On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:16:26AM +1300, Ankur Tyagi wrote: > Thanks for explaining it. > > I am using am335x-evm as reference platform, so as per the link, I should > be using amsdk-08.00.00.00-config.txt but it is based on daisy branch. > Whereas processor-sdk-02.00.01.07-config.txt looks updated one. > > So is it ok to refer to processor-sdk to create my own ? > > ​thanks​ > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:45:43AM +1300, Ankur Tyagi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > oe-layersetup has different set of configs. I couldn't find any > > > documentation explaining "when to use which config". > > > > > > Can someone help me understand the rationale behind these configs ? They > > > all refer to different commits of same repo, so I am sure there must a > > > reason behind it. > > > > http://arago-project.org/wiki/index.php/Setting_Up_Build_Environment > > > > Available Layer Configurations section explains what those configs are. > > > > To summarize - config files in the main configs/ directory are all > > "rolling", > > i.e. they pull latest from corresponding branches of all the layers. Useful > > for development. On the other hand, configs in coresdk, amsdk, glsdk, mcsdk > > and processor-sdk directories are the release configs, i.e. they pin down > > all > > the layers to a specific commit ID at the time of release. That way a given > > release can be reproduced later on. And those SDK names are just product > > names > > to support corresponding TI embedded processor platforms. > > > > > > > For a commercial product, which config should be used to create bsp, > > kernel > > > and rootfs > > > > For your own commercial product, you should create your own config, using > > one > > of the existing ones as an example. > > > > -- > > Denys > >