All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@avagotech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Separate target visibility from reaped state information
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:03:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160202090307.GO27969@c203.arch.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq160y7q5ku.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:11:29PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> >> The only change from the current workflow is that the DEL transition
> >> (now the reaped flag) is done before the spin lock is dropped which
> >> would fix a tiny window for two threads both trying to remove the
> >> same target, but there's nothing that could possibly fix an iterative
> >> soft lockup caused by restarting the loop, which is what the
> >> changelog says.
> 
> Sebastian> James, Martin, what's the status of this patch?  I still hit
> Sebastian> the reported soft lockup on 4.5-rc1.
> 
> And you have verified that Bart's patch applied on top of 4.5-rc1 still
> fixes the lockup? (I know you tested a previous version)
> 

I had an off list discussion/problem report from Dick Kennedy, pointed him
to this very patch and he verified it solved his problem (a lockup like
reported by Sebastian).

I'm not sure if he tested v4.4.X or v4.5-rcX though.

> I am concerned about queuing something as a stable fix if it is just
> masking a fundamental underlying problem. James' comment suggests that
> there is something else going on.
> 
> -- 
> Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering


-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-02  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-08 16:51 [PATCH] Separate target visibility from reaped state information Bart Van Assche
2016-01-18  8:55 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-01-20  0:30 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-01-20  1:03   ` James Bottomley
2016-01-31 17:54     ` Sebastian Herbszt
2016-02-02  1:11       ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-02-02  9:03         ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2016-02-03 17:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-03 17:54           ` James Bottomley
2016-02-03 21:37         ` *** GMX Spamverdacht *** " Sebastian Herbszt
2016-02-07 22:48         ` Sebastian Herbszt
2016-02-02  3:43     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-02-02 11:46       ` James Bottomley
2016-02-02 18:29         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-02-03  0:43           ` James Bottomley
2016-02-03  1:17             ` Bart Van Assche
2016-02-03  2:01               ` James Bottomley
2016-02-03 22:38         ` Sebastian Herbszt
2016-02-03 22:55           ` James Bottomley
2016-02-03 23:28             ` Sebastian Herbszt
2016-02-07 22:56             ` Sebastian Herbszt
2016-02-10 14:05           ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-02-10 15:34             ` James Bottomley
2016-02-10 16:06               ` Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160202090307.GO27969@c203.arch.suse.de \
    --to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dick.kennedy@avagotech.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=herbszt@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.