All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Split default quota limits by quota type V3
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:22:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160202142212.GA5630@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160201212238.GV6033@dastard>

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:22:38AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:57:07AM +0100, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:36:55AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > On 1/28/16 10:57 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > > >  		xfs_disk_dquot_t	*ddqp = &dqp->q_core;
> > > >  
> > > > -		/*
> > > > -		 * The warnings and timers set the grace period given to
> > > > -		 * a user or group before he or she can not perform any
> > > > -		 * more writing. If it is zero, a default is used.
> > > > -		 */
> > > 
> > > Not sure why you removed this comment?
> > > 
> > Regarding this comment, I think it's just redundant with the previous comment, I
> > left it in the code for the V4 though, I believe Dave can rip it off if it is
> > really redundant.
> 
> No, please don't ask me to do make random patch edits on commit -
> it's your job as a patch submitter to get it right. I will sometimes
> do this for simple patches or patches that come from a
> never-seen-before-and-never-seen-again patch submitter, but for a
> regular developer submitting non-trivial patches I won't change the
> patches because the issue hasn't been sorted out during peer review.
> 
Hey, I apologize, I had no intention to give you any extra job :) I meant that
in case you agreed or not with the comment, I thought you could decide by
ripping the comment off or not, I had no intention to actually give you some
unfinished job.

In any case, I sent a V4 of this patch with the comment's change Eric suggested,
adding his review-by too, although, a quick look from him again would be nice,
I'll figure it out with him.

cheers.


> Work it out with Eric, get a reviewed-by tag, and I'll apply it as
> reviewed.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

-- 
Carlos

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-02 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-28 16:57 [PATCH] xfs: Split default quota limits by quota type V3 Carlos Maiolino
2016-01-28 17:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-02-01  9:42   ` Carlos Maiolino
2016-02-01  9:57   ` Carlos Maiolino
2016-02-01 21:22     ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-02 14:22       ` Carlos Maiolino [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160202142212.GA5630@redhat.com \
    --to=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.